Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp176530rwe; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:14:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5TVhKhxYF7GG+Cyqk+NclHpiD9ijL0BqPi5/4bV4rNdWGSXoziH/Ea8IP1nQ1HgRJ0oxKy X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60c7:b0:731:2be4:f72d with SMTP id hv7-20020a17090760c700b007312be4f72dmr19598626ejc.639.1661930071146; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:14:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661930071; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jI8tvh7WABwmzQLtXR/9E9wDu2bO9UB5no95LvuPtbwddKRuT9KGu0Gl/vx61A1X4H yBGLOkVGqpUBIaNRAwAFz1Ut/AkjNgCoNM8Dpjo0hp1ZhPjqR2RaX8xSXFKQYE5JvaEi qj46uuQjSVO/lq5MMK+JbSb66wvDNuWG24fqA5TVuHj88rnanNViTeGWzjkEUBTVealu iBFp/Xq6j4em3pUchV6T1eE5GYsvQzBBD3CkVQH3dMOtwRqgNGSF2L/CUvzv9QAltk/K S9aw8cerauG65KiHylhwXQaGeq8xfxm3hpxNGYMUyH1gomPs+dt+yoRR09s2AyBN33WB Hv1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=VmpBA+Q3X/5U87ku9YuGuMx178HGoe3sTTvvj5Dbgeo=; b=to6y/2Cez0ak162fnt4WpqVz48nrAhzWznJmx973Q0HSlYlEB+y5rjAje0m/uE2ZhZ EQMK1bP3MuUhenws+Msae8XJNhiAyRKDd7Yt7nESrFpnrJCbMyHjgxsKhwoh29OA1QIP OsfQAZqiR7v94XmQIHWUwl4O/jFVB2C93OJ45pInDHXwgh/+bnvuGkafaZMYVoeNIgM/ 8CGktG5yj+V5Vtktukwi+07ezfEkXkuSzbl1z9AQL3sbnz+iSxDjNC4NyJiMuVyK//j8 pFR5FkMsrSDcPcfTyZBSI1TULPz3z6q9+HvRyBtOfP4WK7xYh70WcDIGLDTKzY/l3tgV hyZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt2-20020a0564020a4200b004479b1d0dbfsi9270501edb.205.2022.08.31.00.14.07; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231159AbiHaHLa (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 03:11:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53062 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229846AbiHaHKq (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 03:10:46 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA8CF20F5E; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MHZvc3L8HzYcnn; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:05:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:10:11 +0800 From: Zhang Yi To: , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH 11/14] ufs: replace ll_rw_block() Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:21:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20220831072111.3569680-12-yi.zhang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220831072111.3569680-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> References: <20220831072111.3569680-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.229) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ufs. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi --- fs/ufs/balloc.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c index bd810d8239f2..bbc2159eece4 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c @@ -296,9 +296,7 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg, if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) map_bh(bh, inode->i_sb, oldb + pos); if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) { - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); - wait_on_buffer(bh); - if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) { + if (bh_read(bh, 0)) { ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__, "read of block failed\n"); break; -- 2.31.1