Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp359106rwe; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 04:13:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5DOYlbGMw8Js7zau3Jlk2gV7nNzXMgf/oAL66l8Y4OlDM8lyhSp23rV/HCxloe+QiIRCAQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:21c2:b0:52b:ff44:666a with SMTP id t2-20020a056a0021c200b0052bff44666amr26015147pfj.83.1661944401354; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 04:13:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661944401; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e5kP+RQdWkPEztTpxqeUqmDD5Qb+z8i6soMALNJqgWedjGyzdOD3JhxWH8+1dGXGUw kRni56fsBThK8K5SVLB5dsxwupuuiRLrgA6yKC1LtT/GMIVCx+41F+e25u9bAmOZY9M/ TArQX0V6mVvP4KXB/3vaoi9xa7jnhgIFWAYkHl4rN0L+c/jCwPAWsEc6H/fqn0dPzbjO 9NMDZjrK2+YELF0oBX3Z3ivWROeweh4RGhS/36rQEwDrSeJkMOVs9j8eo24SpGnD5Xa1 TP9FxE/MMRlvMDkXR41s4az6bqJpRDVTkUNbr/29VCSDhOPlLNavepoFQyfVzT6mH/6C he+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=Ux+/6k6yQ68d20CIHpJNNhVF8b7vMhQjE5cIGh8WXbA=; b=hKrb2Xqn3GDHTstg9+lROYujnLQQC6SgBsoWBtelx2LwMiogSKMFFJlKoJn/hLjHUL XawjkliNxNKcRZFs1UhJxgY7mkCozBMpr5TkPSAcMNZP3sZjnFCgAHM2HKDJircQ8P0M A0avic6CsyeCeIWMThX4uN2j+09C6aoQwOeyTrXvCFI9zR1VHTi44tVlWnEXxAcV291L nJ5+TQTRMuTD+aNs1yJb+6HZzL2Mj9RbExE1jPWDNVthmsf3YR1tTD9rQf9suZRuUj4h 82p4eTDtPipqTlSdCHs/BMup7nnmyPrlR0/V+80mOYJG6VzSnFAZLQz8vIHM3PL4PG9o vQPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=gWzBh39l; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=79CrkKwc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id me15-20020a17090b17cf00b001fe30c193c1si244214pjb.185.2022.08.31.04.13.01; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 04:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=gWzBh39l; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=79CrkKwc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229976AbiHaLGK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:06:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229561AbiHaLGJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:06:09 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3D89C536; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 04:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C7E21A7B; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1661943967; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ux+/6k6yQ68d20CIHpJNNhVF8b7vMhQjE5cIGh8WXbA=; b=gWzBh39lJUgv8YalnH1E/zHqDoZvJuwDJttq0eb5EwKD3gexkpEUqig8vE7ADgEj0aTpVk zmNsNkqdttx1r6tv8m5fU+ur8lf5fuRAEAE26Ontuxm07GZBmWv8Pz8w1DIEfmEFLu9uRJ PxcE/nkR+bxUDvtlQOuzJb8tk5EMZJE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1661943967; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ux+/6k6yQ68d20CIHpJNNhVF8b7vMhQjE5cIGh8WXbA=; b=79CrkKwcDm35RwKykj4Z/UcaMkbv7xV6sge+XImxuYJK/wSO3Zb6g/ir0fibCVSJxWpAkg 84P5fdryH8GO1XBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DD213A7C; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id s7heFZ9AD2MidAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:06:07 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5DBBA067B; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:06:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:06:06 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Zhang Yi Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rpeterso@redhat.com, agruenba@redhat.com, almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com, mark@fasheh.com, dushistov@mail.ru, hch@infradead.org, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] ufs: replace ll_rw_block() Message-ID: <20220831110606.7c25xioli2uxcacr@quack3> References: <20220831072111.3569680-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <20220831072111.3569680-12-yi.zhang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220831072111.3569680-12-yi.zhang@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed 31-08-22 15:21:08, Zhang Yi wrote: > ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot > guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We > could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has > been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ufs. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/ufs/balloc.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c > index bd810d8239f2..bbc2159eece4 100644 > --- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c > +++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c > @@ -296,9 +296,7 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg, > if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) > map_bh(bh, inode->i_sb, oldb + pos); > if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) { > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); > - wait_on_buffer(bh); > - if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) { > + if (bh_read(bh, 0)) { > ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__, > "read of block failed\n"); > break; > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR