Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp886269rwe; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7QrASduFzMDeRXXz2LztKtP/Z3f5tpMrtTNwGMb9pUMp/KK5+vVQJc333zMD5+ONCT5Qyo X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:401a:b0:448:2ce5:652a with SMTP id d26-20020a056402401a00b004482ce5652amr16821562eda.322.1662048257081; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662048257; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=likORJi/SbHD1/p+3IhfPuJoc9Mo7iZKxwtqR3qR+qobfTymIRxom1T6YJA9jpTO45 MbQvy2A6mwDkWub31wQxtT6111J39f2xkb97EOdrnLl3rRZCLqlFHBhsk+Yw3moHftoL hjloYtjgpvv/HsAb0TjJiizmsGV0BgszvETKN/wpuD9BPAe8+kzySFZ/LAObhHI4Effz Tdu+5ewQNj2ysFB3+QgDPdxWgbXqdtluQkH0iCxtK3c76Ly9fbfVz+MT+GPB18JY0zbf p6F0WhVMACqMqf1QidifVQ7ijb3tX111c6BxoDkUG4xz8WdYh8BBg5VOkmXgT76lBNZ6 NVCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=q8YiT/4hwzXdCPEllSvmSZIP1os1aETg6NXJXjqiNLQ=; b=WAL6H9wVffUKrRsVKhnIGDFr7SONj2AHxs6LlMut13Rz+XYUe3qB5q85T5JF5BtYRx V08vSSxY2AtHG6Q0/fGcI7NNIW2cL9eQefwWrv/QsRD0qHqplOwUbXetblG/+AVFVT2/ Sj/rIoTK2vPCSxCMSUsMIfXij2sGtcQXvkYvhipxC4Ml96D0SiSi6NoRCbvkKLT5EB1l MQ6k0ekbRAXcwoGUkcDMNF9NbGe5vN0g6LZMXsprsGaD8P9Dey85V+sh49Y/dtugnhu1 aRmXdUgjq3XIdtrKJDHEYuzw48Zn71n7s4r8bkBSgIg0iKCvcFeD6LNLrhYNLlthMVEI xVRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=TLpk4Shh; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id du1-20020a17090772c100b0072b580c899dsi7247942ejc.71.2022.09.01.09.03.50; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=TLpk4Shh; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233919AbiIAPwk (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:52:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60178 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234630AbiIAPwj (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:52:39 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2021779A69; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 858EF201E1; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:52:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1662047556; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q8YiT/4hwzXdCPEllSvmSZIP1os1aETg6NXJXjqiNLQ=; b=TLpk4ShhamaRL4KgNMoHEEhUn6Xc/7/VQ+0qhUMC/fEDGJcS2uL2TFP4zk+sewHUuOX6/R I8aKXWdJjiLgRa03S70GA9TeJSg0JubIAx6aYusSvpNG3XD7dozCrkU4bEmBJXAnNOpAfo 1mo1ZgegfbwQy3PsGx0EtqxywkND9io= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1662047556; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q8YiT/4hwzXdCPEllSvmSZIP1os1aETg6NXJXjqiNLQ=; b=vqi1oY9XAS6f7xHgj0gG1kt2ZLSWqQcw6ydnfegz3HXi3vYh164/XPX0q4KSEVH0sKNtHp gL8CVMxOkD6OQnBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 767A913A89; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id zNbpHETVEGMPBQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:52:36 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D721AA067C; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:52:35 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Zhang Yi Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rpeterso@redhat.com, agruenba@redhat.com, almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com, mark@fasheh.com, dushistov@mail.ru, hch@infradead.org, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] reiserfs: replace ll_rw_block() Message-ID: <20220901155235.4m3hrnxk65wbimco@quack3> References: <20220901133505.2510834-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <20220901133505.2510834-10-yi.zhang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220901133505.2510834-10-yi.zhang@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu 01-09-22 21:35:00, Zhang Yi wrote: > ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read/write path because it cannot > guarantee that submitting read/write IO if the buffer has been locked. > We could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() in read path if > the buffer has been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in > reiserfs. We also switch to new bh_readahead_batch() helper for the > buffer array readahead path. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/reiserfs/journal.c | 11 ++++++----- > fs/reiserfs/stree.c | 4 ++-- > fs/reiserfs/super.c | 4 +--- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c > index 94addfcefede..9f62da7471c9 100644 > --- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c > +++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c > @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static int write_ordered_buffers(spinlock_t * lock, > */ > if (buffer_dirty(bh) && unlikely(bh->b_page->mapping == NULL)) { > spin_unlock(lock); > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_WRITE, 1, &bh); > + write_dirty_buffer(bh, 0); > spin_lock(lock); > } > put_bh(bh); > @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s, > if (tbh) { > if (buffer_dirty(tbh)) { > depth = reiserfs_write_unlock_nested(s); > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_WRITE, 1, &tbh); > + write_dirty_buffer(tbh, 0); > reiserfs_write_lock_nested(s, depth); > } > put_bh(tbh) ; > @@ -2240,7 +2240,7 @@ static int journal_read_transaction(struct super_block *sb, > } > } > /* read in the log blocks, memcpy to the corresponding real block */ > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, get_desc_trans_len(desc), log_blocks); > + bh_read_batch(get_desc_trans_len(desc), log_blocks); > for (i = 0; i < get_desc_trans_len(desc); i++) { > > wait_on_buffer(log_blocks[i]); > @@ -2342,10 +2342,11 @@ static struct buffer_head *reiserfs_breada(struct block_device *dev, > } else > bhlist[j++] = bh; > } > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, j, bhlist); > + bh = bhlist[0]; > + bh_read_nowait(bh, 0); > + bh_readahead_batch(j - 1, &bhlist[1], 0); > for (i = 1; i < j; i++) > brelse(bhlist[i]); > - bh = bhlist[0]; > wait_on_buffer(bh); > if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) > return bh; > diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/stree.c b/fs/reiserfs/stree.c > index 9a293609a022..84c12a1947b2 100644 > --- a/fs/reiserfs/stree.c > +++ b/fs/reiserfs/stree.c > @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int search_by_key_reada(struct super_block *s, > if (!buffer_uptodate(bh[j])) { > if (depth == -1) > depth = reiserfs_write_unlock_nested(s); > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ | REQ_RAHEAD, 1, bh + j); > + bh_readahead(bh[j], REQ_RAHEAD); > } > brelse(bh[j]); > } > @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, > if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && depth == -1) > depth = reiserfs_write_unlock_nested(sb); > > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); > + bh_read_nowait(bh, 0); > wait_on_buffer(bh); > > if (depth != -1) > diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/super.c b/fs/reiserfs/super.c > index c88cd2ce0665..a5ffec0c7517 100644 > --- a/fs/reiserfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/reiserfs/super.c > @@ -1702,9 +1702,7 @@ static int read_super_block(struct super_block *s, int offset) > /* after journal replay, reread all bitmap and super blocks */ > static int reread_meta_blocks(struct super_block *s) > { > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s)); > - wait_on_buffer(SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s)); > - if (!buffer_uptodate(SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s))) { > + if (bh_read(SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s), 0) < 0) { > reiserfs_warning(s, "reiserfs-2504", "error reading the super"); > return 1; > } > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR