Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp888309rwe; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:05:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4ZQkTBfrnKD3i35ZGyGuZmbkiyYUdbxMflWih0xFdulwfhwWg3VGftsm8tQpJ0FKiLJqop X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6d98:b0:741:3872:b9c2 with SMTP id sb24-20020a1709076d9800b007413872b9c2mr19413693ejc.259.1662048337271; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:05:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662048337; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xFrtv195ZOCU0TPXMPJSYN4STXoBmeTcocOnMr3tn4k91aS2hqZXSnHXtiQ408IFvq fslvKX3yEw8hKxR4JNoveVtjjY0d/AQ9B4PyuaaZ3cCw0k4NbEWrDjPG70CsqiUYgP8u ETrn958P2epFQfjwkZDCZB6c4dMLr6wKkuaHfRBCxxy5iRCODSrdcEAkg4mtHXA+QOKK 5SS5wRr7u8sNb/VqkGVvfnPoKG2Xw7Tej2nDqMu+L/mCy+JJ9bzfOhQRFto4Uf0x/Zvr 0mqbM7lGJP+3disfhn8j00inB6BiRJrkJck+5fW1zZsplAa6Wl/+x9l/oI+TbbwZp23U oMyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=2ZHzkmvovrbUUNg7omW+A+uLbWs5jnT10RXVkkl6wFY=; b=kk/EQx8auJBhZdbVeqtg3g1yo3nU/WAQKkE9ufXcpdRIYgajHQZkrP3nkjWzWRf+KA Rm7OppEsQIgFftVPEgHwbVVemeM80tbYie1nYQsw9j5TkRe2aTAOatp9mUGMB10nk4kt my3QNoFLHBhkEGfZ5pYG4GJ9YeVZW5czBKfH+xYTbWVkxfxG5Co+CzRj3YwXCSqCx0Wv NopGhqNEl0olJ+1nJPdBzvodRJYqAkGU5kCO4PSO3hVUnUC+YmOr1kM4Vw+KRzdCtnmp Zu3M16p4v5NEvxpvY9N+eJEHi/cc1DpZ+R/FBjBKMe2RTM1rDuzdJNj6/gqJlH07tTjo xeKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="p/HoZKGQ"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bf27-20020a0564021a5b00b00448b1b2d946si1797188edb.261.2022.09.01.09.05.01; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="p/HoZKGQ"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234699AbiIAP6t (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:58:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42682 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234768AbiIAP6m (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:58:42 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A0338E0EA; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A7E22B10; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:58:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1662047919; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2ZHzkmvovrbUUNg7omW+A+uLbWs5jnT10RXVkkl6wFY=; b=p/HoZKGQ+Chf8aIZwmQEIpDzJkxuKlTPTzJLwChS5aMHA/ud76xS+P4Pk8KzIcoW+5/3Eb AeK/HYfcVwN5y+svRwYg23MnrmWilnjsmT2vy7Tu/e69J2Og2bFhLCM7z0oy4eGa9LhCt/ DiwPnrcUrzS6SeDOb1Pux/BZHMN2hkA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1662047919; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2ZHzkmvovrbUUNg7omW+A+uLbWs5jnT10RXVkkl6wFY=; b=9ZRLqgMKoOF3e0PR9VpKkxfW/7/iQpv6TftC2aYuMTvDhiE8g67tMvprr0Hqx4cACz6+I6 bI5hmGqJGZE9OfBA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2AC13A89; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id YhzfGq/WEGO1BwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:58:39 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E78B9A067C; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:58:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:58:38 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Zhang Yi Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rpeterso@redhat.com, agruenba@redhat.com, almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com, mark@fasheh.com, dushistov@mail.ru, hch@infradead.org, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/14] udf: replace ll_rw_block() Message-ID: <20220901155838.24kdcxwaduc4c7pr@quack3> References: <20220901133505.2510834-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <20220901133505.2510834-11-yi.zhang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220901133505.2510834-11-yi.zhang@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu 01-09-22 21:35:01, Zhang Yi wrote: > ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot > guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We > could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has > been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block(). We also switch to > new bh_readahead_batch() helper for the buffer array readahead path. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Looks good to me. Honza > --- > fs/udf/dir.c | 2 +- > fs/udf/directory.c | 2 +- > fs/udf/inode.c | 8 +------- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/udf/dir.c b/fs/udf/dir.c > index cad3772f9dbe..be640f4b2f2c 100644 > --- a/fs/udf/dir.c > +++ b/fs/udf/dir.c > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int udf_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) > brelse(tmp); > } > if (num) { > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ | REQ_RAHEAD, num, bha); > + bh_readahead_batch(num, bha, REQ_RAHEAD); > for (i = 0; i < num; i++) > brelse(bha[i]); > } > diff --git a/fs/udf/directory.c b/fs/udf/directory.c > index a2adf6293093..16bcf2c6b8b3 100644 > --- a/fs/udf/directory.c > +++ b/fs/udf/directory.c > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct fileIdentDesc *udf_fileident_read(struct inode *dir, loff_t *nf_pos, > brelse(tmp); > } > if (num) { > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ | REQ_RAHEAD, num, bha); > + bh_readahead_batch(num, bha, REQ_RAHEAD); > for (i = 0; i < num; i++) > brelse(bha[i]); > } > diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c > index 8d06daed549f..dce6ae9ae306 100644 > --- a/fs/udf/inode.c > +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c > @@ -1211,13 +1211,7 @@ struct buffer_head *udf_bread(struct inode *inode, udf_pblk_t block, > if (!bh) > return NULL; > > - if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) > - return bh; > - > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); > - > - wait_on_buffer(bh); > - if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) > + if (bh_read(bh, 0) >= 0) > return bh; > > brelse(bh); > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR