Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp7248346rwn; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:02:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6IKKGy6DmXvR9M9AgU2zBgqUZCDLNoTwWo8gGpYpAj0T4+ZLyOT0gQSDTtuwmkuc/XE7T+ X-Received: by 2002:a63:4b:0:b0:42c:f091:20f6 with SMTP id 72-20020a63004b000000b0042cf09120f6mr28663459pga.64.1663113751786; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:02:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663113751; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OKE2EDzSr23tb0McRqSJiGdf8QSsvx/So1f0PrJMUQY449vJmonNqu3SRg6ShDaMnr m7dJLmhtDyPgn6doq8jxnSM09KRhAzYMm+KYkrZLRfG8PpT04bo1dl1Q+UPseTJpwbOe MhuaDN7XHDpD6NLPdGgQypOgOF1Z+5trklapOFfYi8Pm1JaDj/Kqw+bZd//H0Qdv/sUB XfT4ocMmA119qgKTUNwWa8w+IKv0M7oI+St2Qs2mqdczD3GHvNGpDl1p8UsEZtXreF9L oFGAa8ajpLvU1nmsnZHg7zWdQACbqlxXlosKXL1ta4VCTi5FyRhgypeTADxn1dSTYksw 6mKA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=v21BwDjGifqQ0l1K9dGdxoTEOIcJ7tunhncbB/oA2Is=; b=SS+rBPVRw6caSOz/ppfndAkMREMP+2BmULSlBXpXVdubAd1H12NbSz6X2RSbOJiLzq vL1CItJ6ClI1yQZRLFfAuqbfjLlPM1BTYuDdyAHjrwEv0mOAqg9eO5AKNaaNjcd4pXLa /x2epfy/BLk9np/J2Hk3gdAstGAUljyJlV1Weic+8IiPcfySLpGoRd6Fp408ezP+M62d azfa9KlREplZeRwQoYvzXtmd7jVF4hEgXf5MoSDruBFaUhHP+1iNa3S7RiivzrTTq797 zc1x7j2a369GjY4zQ9CcDzP2Lfy0M3UqlZ0bfFKdxnxfye9qi/zRblyu19L3dXbqp3KZ hy/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@collabora.com header.s=mail header.b="PO3G7/U8"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i69-20020a638748000000b0043898414330si10247639pge.164.2022.09.13.17.02.13; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@collabora.com header.s=mail header.b="PO3G7/U8"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229629AbiIMXmS (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:42:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229572AbiIMXmR (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:42:17 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98BA343606 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (modemcable141.102-20-96.mc.videotron.ca [96.20.102.141]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: krisman) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 316156602027; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:42:15 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1663112535; bh=Ye9ctBXY+vK0987QXsEMGtd9H+aj+uA1GWgh+3zErFs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PO3G7/U8atFyPFJPblUtyhzpZxHfRTadKtBSaLs8jVU2Enzp93qQSljfYNE1GvKix 7CylNDWWyonLFUHCgb9QFOI4GtD+ekGjRx20pLw8FpdxYjwYnSW3xpFBNA+8/SCWp5 s/yxIVwSwS9yWZpFdTelIRhJz+MktIswRdW9bJVyiJdup27Y5H4cQZBa5ZU1JSqNpP j+PLqpgFIK/lMBul8TJIGb71j0Re5rwXJv4hKhULy1tG68io6sSOjMDtJwa9N3KxrJ poWWtY1vad6uU948endtdN8kAn0YxZ/LAFFgAhcRxqIRJ14yNrFBnF1kbXk9oaHxAC mO2Ww44MRbe4Q== From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jaegeuk@kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , kernel@collabora.com Subject: [PATCH v9 4/8] ext4: Reuse generic_ci_match for ci comparisons Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:41:46 -0400 Message-Id: <20220913234150.513075-5-krisman@collabora.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3 In-Reply-To: <20220913234150.513075-1-krisman@collabora.com> References: <20220913234150.513075-1-krisman@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Instead of reimplementing ext4_match_ci, use the new libfs helper. It also adds a comment explaining why fname->cf_name.name must be checked prior to the encryption hash optimization, because that tripped me before. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi --- Changes since v6: - Readd cf_name != NULL on hash verification and comment explaining it (eric) --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 91 +++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c index 089ea8b42a1e..9c892c58abf2 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c @@ -1364,58 +1364,6 @@ static void dx_insert_block(struct dx_frame *frame, u32 hash, ext4_lblk_t block) } #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE) -/* - * Test whether a case-insensitive directory entry matches the filename - * being searched for. If quick is set, assume the name being looked up - * is already in the casefolded form. - * - * Returns: 0 if the directory entry matches, more than 0 if it - * doesn't match or less than zero on error. - */ -static int ext4_ci_compare(const struct inode *parent, const struct qstr *name, - u8 *de_name, size_t de_name_len, bool quick) -{ - const struct super_block *sb = parent->i_sb; - const struct unicode_map *um = sb->s_encoding; - struct fscrypt_str decrypted_name = FSTR_INIT(NULL, de_name_len); - struct qstr entry = QSTR_INIT(de_name, de_name_len); - int ret; - - if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent)) { - const struct fscrypt_str encrypted_name = - FSTR_INIT(de_name, de_name_len); - - decrypted_name.name = kmalloc(de_name_len, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!decrypted_name.name) - return -ENOMEM; - ret = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(parent, 0, 0, &encrypted_name, - &decrypted_name); - if (ret < 0) - goto out; - entry.name = decrypted_name.name; - entry.len = decrypted_name.len; - } - - if (quick) - ret = utf8_strncasecmp_folded(um, name, &entry); - else - ret = utf8_strncasecmp(um, name, &entry); - if (ret < 0) { - /* Handle invalid character sequence as either an error - * or as an opaque byte sequence. - */ - if (sb_has_strict_encoding(sb)) - ret = -EINVAL; - else if (name->len != entry.len) - ret = 1; - else - ret = !!memcmp(name->name, entry.name, entry.len); - } -out: - kfree(decrypted_name.name); - return ret; -} - int ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *iname, struct ext4_filename *name) { @@ -1478,20 +1426,35 @@ static bool ext4_match(struct inode *parent, #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE) if (parent->i_sb->s_encoding && IS_CASEFOLDED(parent) && (!IS_ENCRYPTED(parent) || fscrypt_has_encryption_key(parent))) { - if (fname->cf_name.name) { - if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent)) { - if (fname->hinfo.hash != EXT4_DIRENT_HASH(de) || - fname->hinfo.minor_hash != - EXT4_DIRENT_MINOR_HASH(de)) { + int ret; - return false; - } - } - return !ext4_ci_compare(parent, &fname->cf_name, - de->name, de->name_len, true); + /* + * Just checking IS_ENCRYPTED(parent) below is not + * sufficient to decide whether one can use the hash for + * skipping the string comparison, because the key might + * have been added right after + * ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(). In this case, a hash + * mismatch will be a false negative. Therefore, make + * sure cf_name was properly initialized before + * considering the calculated hash. + */ + if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent) && fname->cf_name.name && + (fname->hinfo.hash != EXT4_DIRENT_HASH(de) || + fname->hinfo.minor_hash != EXT4_DIRENT_MINOR_HASH(de))) + return false; + + ret = generic_ci_match(parent, fname->usr_fname, + &fname->cf_name, de->name, + de->name_len); + if (ret < 0) { + /* + * Treat comparison errors as not a match. The + * only case where it happens is on a disk + * corruption or ENOMEM. + */ + return false; } - return !ext4_ci_compare(parent, fname->usr_fname, de->name, - de->name_len, false); + return ret; } #endif -- 2.37.3