Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp483991rwb; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:28:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Eijfn9WgwR4+OK2zu4qxShk3riwBnWXqgfh7jiw1W/cEv/2rM4k5vwLrv58uIBc7pXT8X X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c702:b0:178:9fb3:419a with SMTP id p2-20020a170902c70200b001789fb3419amr21438336plp.35.1664180896844; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:28:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664180896; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mTlt3ApWTg/Wl3Vcpao7tYya5/2ejkC3miwuvWvhsSCG9wJ3GiBlNydag35ORXsKy9 UG/ylMx0o+eFXd0CjVmydQXNuCbtGqGuwvNq8s8Eo4EWkkUmKgHjHFIAt/5ZmB8o8v30 ZpJ4BQMjHhDlX2vNA0+OvFhNQmXSBbmzXjJtOHYUYrbY1PRqcm2ZXnZjBy7hTgb1fKEJ V89ZMvZhMeox36TI6uCR3KSAz1manT2mcshVsDjN8Rakgvb9ktqLKE1i39f5o42/Ejo2 kAo2i/GaWFG8Yf0JW0nKWW/g7+Lxkl8aEVI+gPM5zB8vKJIZTDPHfXb7ES2aU4EnPrdz tKAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=IO/eM9HIBNdBBFIAw0sR5E0YTAhTjpRaz4n41fHaLcY=; b=cL3qI0hs7UZiIo3EcRDqj0ukOLw8JiL27WNqRlnsLpdXVKcRWX+bgPqiNO6c8BlUn+ 0Ui5Uz68SHX7xftf5n/rsnDDxc3AFCrbrqjwSuQhzySRxJXh2nACb4gimQ07bGbO9E2g hFpXmmPZ7HLieYI00lIcvzP41HC0SB6Kr7z3waIq03MhRevrO1f3zHJDlPVRTZOanV+B q9D8FluLAGL6KYhSLPOEPKWkHNaraXJt/D4SrYu9C2pZoItRnaf8gmzuHEDf/RbqfWaK jTj/8PV5b86WeX8rGEKsck2Qycgey+z8iE5mnPhIAFyhDpD8wWzXVZ9S78mTg1GTilW6 6LLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=eonFCWLb; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="yRAMY/4x"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mw11-20020a17090b4d0b00b001f303395c8esi12967303pjb.141.2022.09.26.01.27.44; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=eonFCWLb; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="yRAMY/4x"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233528AbiIZIPZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:15:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42096 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231727AbiIZIPY (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:15:24 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 319017661; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4EDF220B1; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:15:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1664180121; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IO/eM9HIBNdBBFIAw0sR5E0YTAhTjpRaz4n41fHaLcY=; b=eonFCWLbJp+ueDZnuTUZ06+fX7Q4F5/qeP+5IoW0YGI9WtjPz9XVfAgm1pQyhLkzoTjd4r XfdNJVoOiNVOJ/W3kTXHLRIimKSv+yOX+koB6RGLJBYGqlT97Bl/HaVgVyG66BXlF6d367 aMPJxRhSATAqfR1nUdDButskWHX5HaI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1664180121; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IO/eM9HIBNdBBFIAw0sR5E0YTAhTjpRaz4n41fHaLcY=; b=yRAMY/4xuwynNUb3b7PSA7OmBZ+wpCmbdcOEfs6YejPcdR/xNZ658pcDEyUeocW5HLov28 8o4+Hk73AeWAsgDw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D784113486; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id vt+UNJlfMWNFUQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:15:21 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 691D7A0685; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:15:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:15:21 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Ye Bin Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] ext4: remove unnecessary drop path references in mext_check_coverage() Message-ID: <20220926081521.szxq4qizpz54opcm@quack3> References: <20220924021211.3831551-1-yebin10@huawei.com> <20220924021211.3831551-2-yebin10@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220924021211.3831551-2-yebin10@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Sat 24-09-22 10:12:10, Ye Bin wrote: > According to Jan Kara's suggestion: > "The use in mext_check_coverage() can be actually removed > - get_ext_path() -> ext4_find_extent() takes care of dropping the references." > So remove unnecessary call ext4_ext_drop_refs() in mext_check_coverage(). > > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c > index 701f1d6a217f..782bbda2a717 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c > @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ mext_check_coverage(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t from, ext4_lblk_t count, > if (unwritten != ext4_ext_is_unwritten(ext)) > goto out; > from += ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext); > - ext4_ext_drop_refs(path); > } > ret = 1; > out: > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR