Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp1332147rwb; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:28:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6dipWw9e4IsWFSJ9TTTeA4qv2hSyId51LcVpPSzAl31XSzL4rTZfNbowx5pMIo6NuvfTIx X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a02:192:b0:43c:a0cb:44d3 with SMTP id bj18-20020a056a02019200b0043ca0cb44d3mr13389703pgb.139.1664303315397; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:28:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664303315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CcO2HA46yscfogQXf434HDDMKPUGk3n5X+0bCQj37LUkGxdvfuLdAg4+Dh5ySE8zeS 25pd04usOmOgORaVQjgTmHveiESue4IvbWgicIC7FfTpjJ1G8R0sLOk3SoKP8s3uBBSP upLCzGbHAO0fjct96LSCh5tTNm3iiWcQbd54YiqIwY0tymneqpI7z/aQBPE9nOrvxRJ2 wcfiw60pjS/KYsdYT6HfLwAdUZD+s07NwfajmJE2JPUjYnaVyofueRujXaKNCfy+YHEC PmpbuFPitD0Nm+doA97GdvCqJaDoy0ZAJwt9ofQEcRz9t9NjhapondIsr0wU1anV+sDe +3/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:auto-submitted :content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=q3/19Q4kFcSdjjzsVdYx4tOubh+C4WiwpHYY9XLfwyU=; b=WPZf9ANHRWOj46Sux5BGFSAUFpgWUKb11zDxAP2AXfteYGw6YusUj/hzjOu3bj8e5I PegBnXbSyysN7Kd8+nIMJNem5u1a/0y5I4ZpzaAmPQmNWqlYBt42/vKTTkUNFs793FdQ 4Y+AX2mlravJf8RyO0r4/S3fvKm4xSKJ6+Faro/SYmdxldmMWcjajF3EkoDM7RMSAVwn 0IrJoGvWvKev1fhPKYXYb3EBMwwGiygdbWGK4rJNBxI/bZFv485SSgRH7DWinGLkL57j V+uk2KAgQuG7jJH7mhGwOXTEfwoJgl00rvo3JrKaeq0um92JyDWeHLYOSeBCQez59fhF Vbfw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=DkMHuYMY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u7-20020a056a00158700b0053e3640fad1si61124pfk.368.2022.09.27.11.28.14; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=DkMHuYMY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233024AbiI0SGi (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:06:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38094 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233083AbiI0SGh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:06:37 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C0DD98D6 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6772B81CF7 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC349C433C1 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:06:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1664301993; bh=x9z+meJ+MD4gupidK5WHg25/IvGIbquPmCPRv8Wez3Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DkMHuYMYi0kHqA1vvcMNEbnY4r4xuxNwHvOU3EI/DXByvJuQoBzrHc0xdG22WBYzE STI44HVyosjPxhivGurSdCl3Enl63MwZgjl3dy3gzBxZYBAqrSlVuYRl9oBd2brcXf CMsLeO4KLiXnwgpFK2yi6wpr0CChvoFGbcj7Xz5PHjxWiAIQaH365v8BUDhHfoZWeM IkfHKIWERYUmw6VRPTkb0WSZHOODq88iStCuQhJUpQ3XW6h4MgcCyG78dG+bt8vAsN ClnjsoKZUE0JsI2kgHk8FgqXjD9CLRwKg7lVQTMaXBx9t2qgUMdMwN//fyDC6HTS8v fsUvRGmF/TVRg== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 95950C433E9; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:06:33 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 216529] [fstests generic/048] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0x00000069, filemap_release_folio+0x88/0xb0 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:06:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: File System X-Bugzilla-Component: ext4 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tytso@mit.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216529 --- Comment #3 from Theodore Tso (tytso@mit.edu) --- On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:47:02AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216529 >=20 > Yes, it's reproducible for me, I just reproduced it again on another ppc6= 4le > (P8) machine [1]. But it's not easy to reproduce by running generic/048 > (maybe > there's a better way to reproduce it). Can you give a rough percentage of how often it reproduces? e.g., does it reproduces 10% of the time? 50% of the time? 2-3 times after 100 tries, so 2-3%? etc. If it reproduces but rarely, it'll be a lot harder to try to bisect. Something perhaps to try is to enable KASAN, since both stack traces seem to involve a null pointer derference while trying to free buffers. Maybe that will give us some hints towards the cause.... Thanks, - Ted --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=