Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp1145481rwi; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4w7Kbfb9ERSo7iRBL8wa16mnI1JLZgrcg7mlTlPl0nR05wjpM3sOkcXu5vH9KSHu1g/jWh X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d484:b0:17f:7437:565d with SMTP id c4-20020a170902d48400b0017f7437565dmr7051355plg.154.1665780028501; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665780028; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OcE1jyb1JpSLffzVD1lXOW2zXRHBGg450OF3ba2CgjkJeUlbtTkhS4hcUpKpetWLYl u3zRuzJqjJjl1NFh2hUZBsQfHoW2fmjvNpFaAAj9tv9BVlZMI8UOO/VMVINCLBTdmWFV /RjtBSBQsmNMdrz85JdqU6JEZvqFdsu+TPRUu8mr/XW+ipb+d34xBADNiTpnB/cLmQxI 7FI55cDqmjWVFZRHCrmSczDprbUqbCS4HANiuYKDw+0MCepkG/2dsJSk7dEuB1jqPXj2 FK/lB98/YsCPbH8o99KzDdsdcRvdxGoXGCfKAwmUSBR5MreWAMN05o/GDlUhHSvRjBNe xWfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=B4vZrK6YJlL8pOsOJIfCd1dExjqio4WqMVFEwMmL+Y4=; b=zZKhaF0+96bVfF2q3DKcpTDu/GH3M3aalq9N83kwNrpo3YGtcsMrMvATdvmSfgJWec Z/LiPxJHbXHbXJ/Oq9F5fFLzETaR7lOOhVGYlxmaDSRemwux9X+vYkMTrqtmWjsf9xoF q079qaZ2jV4hajZb9JvDec3SgkkOqU8yFBK6uvS8H+zzrEmXa73cXidnrZbB7QK7NFn9 lSyuNQnFBMNEQNQtibUnbXeZ8sdkDTwYGBEK1JEQqjR3N9Y+pctXWxL5h7+P1uyr3EOt sqDGxxyB8gvuFnsRI89RVTw7xKhrblGHRIcg126xlmvTHZuffEyJz/XDWhty/zh/tjQe okSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Hocz8ZIv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3-20020a17090a7ac300b0020ac15764f6si3833092pjl.176.2022.10.14.13.40.12; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Hocz8ZIv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231556AbiJNUh1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:37:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39508 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231515AbiJNUhW (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:37:22 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F52E4C3B; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29EKHic9000567; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:54 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=B4vZrK6YJlL8pOsOJIfCd1dExjqio4WqMVFEwMmL+Y4=; b=Hocz8ZIv1oDo4vmPRDG0WVKiH4B+rgDOQBHPOYl3oWkZEhVBC1U3oFMSlYZ37CDg5eP+ 7z7Gcnt7Sauugb0FS88MGTT36rnFjRyD9ma/jeeJQkQiFbFomZOdEkBj+p5rPsicq93D 6ZVing5+SW99B1YnSoLWn/8DPObBIAluPRKvR7IzioNZXy+mFgaR7bau0UEryVSYy1jM pTrFj/XeZy2WMUj7T+CSHCnIj4tmM+Py2QecXfqRkn7JNC/E+nx/+y6GrP49lfKFsoij yHqVp/TI2icL68f3R93KpagRFAjp4FiL1r4J1zpIR9863mzXdeDpL/QXuODAQN6vu8fR /Q== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3k7d3ak9rc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:53 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29EKSKqD018384; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:53 GMT Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3k7d3ak9qr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 29EKZMk1008037; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:51 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3k30fj7hc7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:51 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 29EKanMY55837180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:49 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B3542041; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D1A4203F; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.122.214]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:36:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Ojaswin Mujoo To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Ritesh Harjani , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , rookxu , Ritesh Harjani Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] ext4: Abstract out overlap fix/check logic in ext4_mb_normalize_request() Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 02:06:27 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Qo9K6rNMRQF8SMcsdJP6doRiWZDtWxnO X-Proofpoint-GUID: FTq9arRGgpkiXbUcdEEa2cifsFOGOaT4 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-14_11,2022-10-14_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2210140112 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Abstract out the logic of fixing PA overlaps in ext4_mb_normalize_request to improve readability of code. This also makes it easier to make changes to the overlap logic in future. There are no functional changes in this patch Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 210f90a6229a..a76fc19ed8d5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -4007,6 +4007,74 @@ ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, rcu_read_unlock(); } +/* + * Given an allocation context "ac" and a range "start", "end", check + * and adjust boundaries if the range overlaps with any of the existing + * preallocatoins stored in the corresponding inode of the allocation context. + * + *Parameters: + * ac allocation context + * start start of the new range + * end end of the new range + */ +static inline void +ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, + ext4_lblk_t *start, ext4_lblk_t *end) +{ + struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode); + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); + struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa; + ext4_lblk_t new_start, new_end; + ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end; + + new_start = *start; + new_end = *end; + + /* check we don't cross already preallocated blocks */ + rcu_read_lock(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) { + if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) + continue; + spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); + if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) { + spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); + continue; + } + + tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart; + tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len); + + /* PA must not overlap original request */ + BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end || + ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start)); + + /* skip PAs this normalized request doesn't overlap with */ + if (tmp_pa_start >= new_end || tmp_pa_end <= new_start) { + spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); + continue; + } + BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start <= new_start && tmp_pa_end >= new_end); + + /* adjust start or end to be adjacent to this pa */ + if (tmp_pa_end <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) { + BUG_ON(tmp_pa_end < new_start); + new_start = tmp_pa_end; + } else if (tmp_pa_start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) { + BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start > new_end); + new_end = tmp_pa_start; + } + spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + /* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */ + ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(ac, new_start, new_end); + + *start = new_start; + *end = new_end; + return; +} + /* * Normalization means making request better in terms of * size and alignment @@ -4021,9 +4089,6 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, loff_t size, start_off; loff_t orig_size __maybe_unused; ext4_lblk_t start; - struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode); - struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa; - ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end; /* do normalize only data requests, metadata requests do not need preallocation */ @@ -4124,47 +4189,10 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, end = start + size; - /* check we don't cross already preallocated blocks */ - rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) { - if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) - continue; - spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); - if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) { - spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); - continue; - } - - tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart; - tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len); - - /* PA must not overlap original request */ - BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end || - ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start)); - - /* skip PAs this normalized request doesn't overlap with */ - if (tmp_pa_start >= end || tmp_pa_end <= start) { - spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); - continue; - } - BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start <= start && tmp_pa_end >= end); + ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(ac, &start, &end); - /* adjust start or end to be adjacent to this pa */ - if (tmp_pa_end <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) { - BUG_ON(tmp_pa_end < start); - start = tmp_pa_end; - } else if (tmp_pa_start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) { - BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start > end); - end = tmp_pa_start; - } - spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock); - } - rcu_read_unlock(); size = end - start; - /* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */ - ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(ac, start, end); - /* * In this function "start" and "size" are normalized for better * alignment and length such that we could preallocate more blocks. -- 2.31.1