Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp1404704rwb; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:26:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7/2yFZFArm2/SP4dw1pVpOxRK4+0LbOTA6UVBQA+OafAEdd9/4cP1Xtf0cptR316u0OSnb X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:41c2:b0:179:f94a:6fda with SMTP id u2-20020a17090341c200b00179f94a6fdamr428750ple.118.1668648384313; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:26:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668648384; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fx5QFgJDp8w1GdtBfff4XO3cV9rhy6yPCwhqLJqiE7KmAQ9AAVuY8AlJLrbsMavKXW BVkEF0je7kxRqzYMHkv38E2pgKQVb/5bAEcgXrji/9/jfL3E6O8gMp1zMLmvjIutT8zu Y5nwzPTyUQ2PSSPMERZd8u7qqIfIHHus0eyFAdTPqh+SCWqIJE6Hiwiwec/3k4tCCqaA wcTkxE81aRqxv+8n4j+op0bq17P1fg89dUxaHywGUfW2KTfuBKBEe1H01GhM8NxLAKHq ijEK4OliY+Hz+cRH+myzTiD11x3nhNHVHU3PA1XnNRMp9v9olTsWvEZUzIXnKtD79yv/ LwOw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=z91nk14mIObIqOVp8zgISmF4ZiBR3Rao3nom0meyhAE=; b=UNLU571gX5DPwVRTSvEUeoi/pUrV1iVlIulWisKwSFwp6qgGnCaLKT/753K7sdAG6l NHsCaIsn+NPBjnnuK+1iw87IDgxYPEeW/1SiReaxdQs2LREDghm4SGijIgFtAaQhJ2xb RMLnqynu/XXqyMb/LV8Cc/RpFTq/5kFFFppSwPX4kN9+ZtwCdDvbzRUvM85+IdKrIXfR s4S7CpST/OxvdL3lY9Y42/lSBm5yyZLAQ40geocLoxmgs8uxVp2zG477LSTkDyTzLAGF zmo9IC4lMNWiIKeVCEI/x3I4/2k19hOCiXnplv4sN37KUeVxbMf0SkU+suwOeOyCVADq lQsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 206-20020a6301d7000000b004768f1cd12esi8873675pgb.782.2022.11.16.17.26.05; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238786AbiKQBVa (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:21:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58844 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238678AbiKQBV3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:21:29 -0500 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF9AD21BD; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NCMZB0Jh5z4f3mSK; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:21:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAnmdaSjHVj0gCfAg--.26536S5; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:21:25 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin , syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fix incorrect calculate 'reserved' in '__es_remove_extent' when enable bigalloc feature Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:42:44 +0800 Message-Id: <20221117014246.610202-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20221117014246.610202-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221117014246.610202-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAnmdaSjHVj0gCfAg--.26536S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJF1UXr1rXF4UJF45CryrCrg_yoW8Kr48p3 y8Ar4UWryfuw1UW3yftw1j9Fn29a4UCrW7WFs3t343uFy5A34Sgr10yFs0vFWYqrWIqw4U XF4rKw1jq3WUXaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvmb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26ryj6rWUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6r1S6rWUM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0 oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7V C0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j 6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF 67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2 z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnU UI43ZEXa7IU1M7K7UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Ye Bin Syzbot report issue as follows: EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_validate_block_bitmap:398: comm rep: bg 0: block 5: invalid block bitmap EXT4-fs (loop0): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 18 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 32 with error 28 EXT4-fs (loop0): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (loop0): Total free blocks count 0 EXT4-fs (loop0): Free/Dirty block details EXT4-fs (loop0): free_blocks=0 EXT4-fs (loop0): dirty_blocks=32 EXT4-fs (loop0): Block reservation details EXT4-fs (loop0): i_reserved_data_blocks=2 EXT4-fs (loop0): Inode 18 (00000000845cd634): i_reserved_data_blocks (1) not cleared! Above issue happens as follows: Assume: sbi->s_cluster_ratio = 16 Step1: Insert delay block [0, 31] -> ei->i_reserved_data_blocks=2 Step2: ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent -> return failed mpage_release_unused_pages -> to release [0, 30] ext4_es_remove_extent -> remove lblk=0 end=30 __es_remove_extent -> len1=0 len2=31-30=1 __es_remove_extent: ... if (len2 > 0) { ... if (len1 > 0) { ... } else { es->es_lblk = end + 1; es->es_len = len2; ... } if (count_reserved) count_rsvd(inode, lblk, orig_es.es_len - len1 - len2, &orig_es, &rc); goto out; -> will return but didn't calculate 'reserved' ... Step3: ext4_destroy_inode -> trigger "i_reserved_data_blocks (1) not cleared!" To solve above issue if 'len2>0' call 'get_rsvd()' before goto out. Reported-by: syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Ye Bin --- fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c index cd0a861853e3..4684eaea9471 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, if (count_reserved) count_rsvd(inode, lblk, orig_es.es_len - len1 - len2, &orig_es, &rc); - goto out; + goto count; } if (len1 > 0) { @@ -1413,6 +1413,7 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, } } +count: if (count_reserved) *reserved = get_rsvd(inode, end, es, &rc); out: -- 2.31.1