Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To:     Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc:     <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] ext4: Remove ordered data support from ext4_writepage()
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:36:00 +0100
Message-Id: <20221130163608.29034-9-jack@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20221130162435.2324-1-jack@suse.cz>
References: <20221130162435.2324-1-jack@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

ext4_writepage() should not be called for ordered data anymore. Remove
support for it from the function.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 116 ++++++------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index c131b611dabf..0c8e700265f1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1642,12 +1642,6 @@ static void ext4_print_free_blocks(struct inode *inode)
 	return;
 }
 
-static int ext4_bh_delay_or_unwritten(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
-				      struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
-	return (buffer_delay(bh) || buffer_unwritten(bh)) && buffer_dirty(bh);
-}
-
 /*
  * ext4_insert_delayed_block - adds a delayed block to the extents status
  *                             tree, incrementing the reserved cluster/block
@@ -1962,56 +1956,17 @@ static int __ext4_journalled_writepage(struct page *page,
 }
 
 /*
- * Note that we don't need to start a transaction unless we're journaling data
- * because we should have holes filled from ext4_page_mkwrite(). We even don't
- * need to file the inode to the transaction's list in ordered mode because if
- * we are writing back data added by write(), the inode is already there and if
- * we are writing back data modified via mmap(), no one guarantees in which
- * transaction the data will hit the disk. In case we are journaling data, we
- * cannot start transaction directly because transaction start ranks above page
- * lock so we have to do some magic.
- *
- * This function can get called via...
- *   - ext4_writepages after taking page lock (have journal handle)
- *   - journal_submit_inode_data_buffers (no journal handle)
- *   - shrink_page_list via the kswapd/direct reclaim (no journal handle)
- *   - grab_page_cache when doing write_begin (have journal handle)
- *
- * We don't do any block allocation in this function. If we have page with
- * multiple blocks we need to write those buffer_heads that are mapped. This
- * is important for mmaped based write. So if we do with blocksize 1K
- * truncate(f, 1024);
- * a = mmap(f, 0, 4096);
- * a[0] = 'a';
- * truncate(f, 4096);
- * we have in the page first buffer_head mapped via page_mkwrite call back
- * but other buffer_heads would be unmapped but dirty (dirty done via the
- * do_wp_page). So writepage should write the first block. If we modify
- * the mmap area beyond 1024 we will again get a page_fault and the
- * page_mkwrite callback will do the block allocation and mark the
- * buffer_heads mapped.
- *
- * We redirty the page if we have any buffer_heads that is either delay or
- * unwritten in the page.
- *
- * We can get recursively called as show below.
- *
- *	ext4_writepage() -> kmalloc() -> __alloc_pages() -> page_launder() ->
- *		ext4_writepage()
- *
- * But since we don't do any block allocation we should not deadlock.
- * Page also have the dirty flag cleared so we don't get recurive page_lock.
+ * This function is now used only when journaling data. We cannot start
+ * transaction directly because transaction start ranks above page lock so we
+ * have to do some magic.
  */
 static int ext4_writepage(struct page *page,
 			  struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
-	int ret = 0;
 	loff_t size;
 	unsigned int len;
-	struct buffer_head *page_bufs = NULL;
 	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
-	struct ext4_io_submit io_submit;
 
 	if (unlikely(ext4_forced_shutdown(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)))) {
 		folio_invalidate(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
@@ -2036,60 +1991,16 @@ static int ext4_writepage(struct page *page,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	page_bufs = page_buffers(page);
-	/*
-	 * We cannot do block allocation or other extent handling in this
-	 * function. If there are buffers needing that, we have to redirty
-	 * the page. But we may reach here when we do a journal commit via
-	 * journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and in that case we must write
-	 * allocated buffers to achieve data=ordered mode guarantees.
-	 *
-	 * Also, if there is only one buffer per page (the fs block
-	 * size == the page size), if one buffer needs block
-	 * allocation or needs to modify the extent tree to clear the
-	 * unwritten flag, we know that the page can't be written at
-	 * all, so we might as well refuse the write immediately.
-	 * Unfortunately if the block size != page size, we can't as
-	 * easily detect this case using ext4_walk_page_buffers(), but
-	 * for the extremely common case, this is an optimization that
-	 * skips a useless round trip through ext4_bio_write_page().
-	 */
-	if (ext4_walk_page_buffers(NULL, inode, page_bufs, 0, len, NULL,
-				   ext4_bh_delay_or_unwritten)) {
-		redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
-		if ((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) ||
-		    (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize == PAGE_SIZE)) {
-			/*
-			 * For memory cleaning there's no point in writing only
-			 * some buffers. So just bail out. Warn if we came here
-			 * from direct reclaim.
-			 */
-			WARN_ON_ONCE((current->flags & (PF_MEMALLOC|PF_KSWAPD))
-							== PF_MEMALLOC);
-			unlock_page(page);
-			return 0;
-		}
-	}
-
-	if (PageChecked(page) && ext4_should_journal_data(inode))
-		/*
-		 * It's mmapped pagecache.  Add buffers and journal it.  There
-		 * doesn't seem much point in redirtying the page here.
-		 */
-		return __ext4_journalled_writepage(page, len);
-
-	ext4_io_submit_init(&io_submit, wbc);
-	io_submit.io_end = ext4_init_io_end(inode, GFP_NOFS);
-	if (!io_submit.io_end) {
-		redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!ext4_should_journal_data(inode));
+	if (!PageChecked(page)) {
 		unlock_page(page);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		return 0;
 	}
-	ret = ext4_bio_write_page(&io_submit, page, len);
-	ext4_io_submit(&io_submit);
-	/* Drop io_end reference we got from init */
-	ext4_put_io_end_defer(io_submit.io_end);
-	return ret;
+	/*
+	 * It's mmapped pagecache.  Add buffers and journal it.  There
+	 * doesn't seem much point in redirtying the page here.
+	 */
+	return __ext4_journalled_writepage(page, len);
 }
 
 static int mpage_submit_page(struct mpage_da_data *mpd, struct page *page)
@@ -3142,9 +3053,8 @@ static int ext4_da_write_end(struct file *file,
 	 * i_disksize since writeback will push i_disksize upto i_size
 	 * eventually. If the end of the current write is > i_size and
 	 * inside an allocated block (ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize()
-	 * check), we need to update i_disksize here as neither
-	 * ext4_writepage() nor certain ext4_writepages() paths not
-	 * allocating blocks update i_disksize.
+	 * check), we need to update i_disksize here as ext4_writepages() need
+	 * not do it in this case.
 	 *
 	 * Note that we defer inode dirtying to generic_write_end() /
 	 * ext4_da_write_inline_data_end().
-- 
2.35.3