Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp355324rwb; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:25:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7qQLlPK6qmFC/cXjyzxdbY3PynCWWyTUyPoH16dSiZ2up3djAV4ZKO2oVxVg9aFgl6hwX/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:358b:b0:ac:8a8e:164e with SMTP id az11-20020a056a21358b00b000ac8a8e164emr1807923pzc.41.1670469933727; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:25:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670469933; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cB5iR7TnsQTnwzfraEC/jDkr/2ofNOxy1myjUuR5CQaeUYsF9BWTy8hIijEp64zKLn QGF4mr4mkqjMG0gRzvdyuc5GUSyEMJWgiinrHUQF+yt6H29Y7Ri1pbfOSLGOCp4hYtl0 rybDbVt040TFu0rCyNk5ngIvmugjv/t4J1xVyk1/c94n2MdUpXniZ7aVhFk9aodU7sFU d6oENYggB1Riiin5qNzPaFeoTnr7FRJT7KGSRDnyFQBRlmNz++tZ0wtv/jsB8yMqZrX6 RMIaK7yaymZkVh+NMkOva6IfUTZ2rZWBcf12pPN45MtVvvyfpOkK33TNtnhLx4J9WSRW +h6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=k0sTx5ydK6feM2AYg5kOhze3anzM9Lx4IVqyX1QYzSQ=; b=PaNqAf2jrYRddOeUQH5oLpWkyfYkCIeZimPzagwPMwTU4ty9VWF0a5whsVVXo63iAP 4Wa0EOpOan5fIQQUia5/yyXmngObZTm6U2OqqZShMK55hOBLIAuZidtTkVdCoM+enguo tbr0cZHVs5acG4yqaWk38cfbOddCIurkv8oPA0AIfJepFCf1umc7A19ErexjMOUxg4q7 k61uLm5piIthxBUT0SbLG2c4fNjD7RJDtWeP/yyGX52VT1ABD37YWAEFERi/JNh3bYxz cFuZEMR9fvDQUd3tWe5XXRJtc1A9//f+V78YQq9SMdSxWfclC602FDBfnr4E4hngXPtF eSKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v202-20020a6361d3000000b004786a03b872si9131380pgb.761.2022.12.07.19.25.17; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:25:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229462AbiLHDNm (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:42 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55802 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229523AbiLHDNi (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:38 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB67E6F0DD; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:13:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NSK3v1rXwz4f3v5d; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:13:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S5; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:13:34 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin , syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] ext4: fix incorrect calculate 'reserved' in '__es_remove_extent' when enable bigalloc feature Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:34:24 +0800 Message-Id: <20221208033426.1832460-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJF1UXr1rXF4UJF45CryrCrg_yoW8KFWDp3 y8Ar4UWryfuw1UW3yfJw1j9rn29a4UCr47WFs3t343uFy5A34Sgr10kFs0vFWYqrWIga1D XFWrtw12q3WUJaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvmb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26ryj6rWUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0 oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7V C0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j 6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF 67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2 z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnU UI43ZEXa7IU1M7K7UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Ye Bin Syzbot report issue as follows: EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_validate_block_bitmap:398: comm rep: bg 0: block 5: invalid block bitmap EXT4-fs (loop0): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 18 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 32 with error 28 EXT4-fs (loop0): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (loop0): Total free blocks count 0 EXT4-fs (loop0): Free/Dirty block details EXT4-fs (loop0): free_blocks=0 EXT4-fs (loop0): dirty_blocks=32 EXT4-fs (loop0): Block reservation details EXT4-fs (loop0): i_reserved_data_blocks=2 EXT4-fs (loop0): Inode 18 (00000000845cd634): i_reserved_data_blocks (1) not cleared! Above issue happens as follows: Assume: sbi->s_cluster_ratio = 16 Step1: Insert delay block [0, 31] -> ei->i_reserved_data_blocks=2 Step2: ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent -> return failed mpage_release_unused_pages -> to release [0, 30] ext4_es_remove_extent -> remove lblk=0 end=30 __es_remove_extent -> len1=0 len2=31-30=1 __es_remove_extent: ... if (len2 > 0) { ... if (len1 > 0) { ... } else { es->es_lblk = end + 1; es->es_len = len2; ... } if (count_reserved) count_rsvd(inode, lblk, ...); goto out; -> will return but didn't calculate 'reserved' ... Step3: ext4_destroy_inode -> trigger "i_reserved_data_blocks (1) not cleared!" To solve above issue if 'len2>0' call 'get_rsvd()' before goto out. Reported-by: syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 8fcc3a580651 ("ext4: rework reserved cluster accounting when invalidating pages") Signed-off-by: Ye Bin --- fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c index cd0a861853e3..7ada374ff27d 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, if (count_reserved) count_rsvd(inode, lblk, orig_es.es_len - len1 - len2, &orig_es, &rc); - goto out; + goto out_get_reserved; } if (len1 > 0) { @@ -1413,6 +1413,7 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, } } +out_get_reserved: if (count_reserved) *reserved = get_rsvd(inode, end, es, &rc); out: -- 2.31.1