Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp13650905rwl; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 11:01:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXu//otiUvIPt8lh+4eB9YtgvWmcsG9/BB6iarWzDWQz6f8AxWzk5dtfWu2LqNEk5yP9cYON X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:398a:b0:af:8e92:3eeb with SMTP id ad10-20020a056a21398a00b000af8e923eebmr62565749pzc.9.1672858891477; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:01:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672858891; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YslqDTHQyMNUiMFTf81Z1wrvH0nzZQsN70g+csRJ9gjlIyzGExvnqxPhENquDM1tlM TQlyt1SFemrmsg4C21NhjYm87cSBQ5VmVz6rUvPjlZZjMO0qDJG8uUv4T+wkFIV6wgmE zE66fJt9FfK3dmzlYUzxVHSTMqhneTBQDogbEPsgzmPeTJAVXO0pM63zmLWxFRuq/6Pv XmForUsWVO5i8iPBVJjfWjnBBfV/VT5hpynjdltF3gqPnkAJTsTZVmxcZ0bx6RrKmzig GpuYyIXp1IrcuUDZcL9VEHdesSQV6EWMee5qP5vx6svmnKT0XJ70ZDfexLRVPfMJLZHE Vl9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=bQHtx1jV1iYY+5vmOG5eBZD9J3BMwuA/6luLhUEcbrA=; b=v6XbxGjzxmXTy1MSuPANDzfvbEw4eTaXcTlgbtJavF+xAQil+bY0DWVwjzbltXSFX0 smqh1BWuiboLWDCuwNxXCd8LEm3ihe32HluKLGMyBFeacBi+a6VQiEvAkD0e2k/zy55n Yc6LorBbnFh8n/I70SidQfnz8pORUlzW4zH+Gp+nmUKrNjVfAqmaJtOh8ltAP8kzpOEy I2sTAh1FJyVPZ/wSBeVI8prNiPfTzUD7F6a/Ou7ZvL8cXeAPNZVYPdHn/YcfRRKjoHRp BbP75WT+BgNrJIeNlOBqhw+azzlECYS5P6RxllflQsyNzGceUYbG/Mfp4aCKiIDA0Icm QhJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=TDExYjJj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l62-20020a638841000000b004a50e1a1c66si4997235pgd.283.2023.01.04.11.01.14; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=TDExYjJj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239909AbjADSv1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 13:51:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235020AbjADSvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 13:51:25 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB43313; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 10:51:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id e6so16743285qkl.4; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 10:51:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bQHtx1jV1iYY+5vmOG5eBZD9J3BMwuA/6luLhUEcbrA=; b=TDExYjJjMUDUUy6AzN61xsH0jeF30hZHwoIFonbaB9tW4bZD2u9VZTOvIU3egt6YkV qjDFO9cClpkhEfxStQv7QAnARC1cUz1J6J46oDCu5WAAxl3NEPfawETfMcz59E23VTph FjIAVcr2JFYxDVEw20eno2RmkotjgTlpY0Z3M2EMWLaxQofHzDRgsLJzuZ75xAh0lgd8 oNt/BucLDPgLKXdMZBbLGP+UotKhlC2GuKsNbj8ybFi7MHAogWPubGcOXp8M+cCMmO24 +fBnHAJtnMeKbwXnWo51NiKRVZfwQf8uByj5XM78o3P46p+HcG2lznbYQnBaMfTpJXXa hEzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=bQHtx1jV1iYY+5vmOG5eBZD9J3BMwuA/6luLhUEcbrA=; b=uujAh2ylC9rKIe2+l+u2CKgdk8TDkQmfloYRAYfTpVDkLNJQC8a+jaCBYZ0sQuBCUB p3861MILePF8H+R/TIdlisbxtNex8yeXUllf16hSg8gZj5qVqXRz43sumsJyBtiLGyol uLhIJ8/5w9RVGYMzQSz3EA2oa8IVmwHmXsvIcOjoZu59A/MiZuBmlM5T23UalxeIK0wJ 7QNiIXJiHH3acqh+Isp/r4rHtdxcyMZaQaXz8ZyqZPIhNQWBh/t7YjQaNaioyjcA3vg6 tK7zGxGF3Lb/ujMkP0f/jE8WmvL+TTDip7BAbUxMw9p52S0PSkWmguCxjibHzImJL/13 6r+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr4YRSimJkilGsbMIqt7aVTbTRTYQwdbgSTXi6PrWcnzzVMaJXs astCmnbdDiT0EbfoSO6fzSjKEAtXNfQ6iqXMWdg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:8305:b0:6fe:e149:de1c with SMTP id pa5-20020a05620a830500b006fee149de1cmr2415370qkn.572.1672858283805; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 10:51:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221231150919.659533-1-agruenba@redhat.com> <20221231150919.659533-4-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] iomap: Rename page_done handler to put_folio To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Viro , Matthew Wilcox , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Am Mi., 4. Jan. 2023 um 18:47 Uhr schrieb Darrick J. Wong : > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 04:09:13PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > The ->page_done() handler in struct iomap_page_ops is now somewhat > > misnamed in that it mainly deals with unlocking and putting a folio, so > > rename it to ->put_folio(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher > > --- > > fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 4 ++-- > > fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 4 ++-- > > include/linux/iomap.h | 10 +++++----- > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c > > index 46206286ad42..0c041459677b 100644 > > --- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c > > +++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c > > @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static int gfs2_iomap_page_prepare(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, > > return gfs2_trans_begin(sdp, RES_DINODE + blocks, 0); > > } > > > > -static void gfs2_iomap_page_done(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, > > +static void gfs2_iomap_put_folio(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, > > unsigned copied, struct folio *folio) > > { > > struct gfs2_trans *tr = current->journal_info; > > @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ static void gfs2_iomap_page_done(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, > > > > static const struct iomap_page_ops gfs2_iomap_page_ops = { > > .page_prepare = gfs2_iomap_page_prepare, > > - .page_done = gfs2_iomap_page_done, > > + .put_folio = gfs2_iomap_put_folio, > > }; > > > > static int gfs2_iomap_begin_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, > > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > index e13d5694e299..2a9bab4f3c79 100644 > > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > > @@ -580,8 +580,8 @@ static void iomap_put_folio(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos, size_t ret, > > { > > const struct iomap_page_ops *page_ops = iter->iomap.page_ops; > > > > - if (page_ops && page_ops->page_done) { > > - page_ops->page_done(iter->inode, pos, ret, folio); > > + if (page_ops && page_ops->put_folio) { > > + page_ops->put_folio(iter->inode, pos, ret, folio); > > } else if (folio) { > > folio_unlock(folio); > > folio_put(folio); > > diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h > > index 743e2a909162..10ec36f373f4 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/iomap.h > > +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h > > @@ -126,18 +126,18 @@ static inline bool iomap_inline_data_valid(const struct iomap *iomap) > > > > /* > > * When a filesystem sets page_ops in an iomap mapping it returns, page_prepare > > - * and page_done will be called for each page written to. This only applies to > > + * and put_folio will be called for each page written to. This only applies to > > "...for each folio written to." Ah, yes. > With that fixed, > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong > > --D > > > > * buffered writes as unbuffered writes will not typically have pages And here, it should be "folios" as well I'd say. Thanks, Andreas > > * associated with them. > > * > > - * When page_prepare succeeds, page_done will always be called to do any > > - * cleanup work necessary. In that page_done call, @folio will be NULL if the > > - * associated folio could not be obtained. When folio is not NULL, page_done > > + * When page_prepare succeeds, put_folio will always be called to do any > > + * cleanup work necessary. In that put_folio call, @folio will be NULL if the > > + * associated folio could not be obtained. When folio is not NULL, put_folio > > * is responsible for unlocking and putting the folio. > > */ > > struct iomap_page_ops { > > int (*page_prepare)(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned len); > > - void (*page_done)(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned copied, > > + void (*put_folio)(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned copied, > > struct folio *folio); > > > > /* > > -- > > 2.38.1 > >