Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp3031961rwb; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:49:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvCq/q0lQJef6ReCDbaL/7cMKFYSk3QgQfJ6A+zmka5XDD2rv3PPa6is3yz559rp+6T33AK X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:49c7:b0:86e:f629:6c9b with SMTP id w7-20020a17090649c700b0086ef6296c9bmr4917358ejv.42.1673866166736; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:49:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673866166; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SpSLdHQMguet0c6ZwkrEUAmffW+naTfH2ROVZ0Pr+dJ/pDmHjCitS4CkjnUP0NEjBR ht7KAwsgdzly3Xl3UxTOUC49wGocXnY7+6/3sIW+Rey81/1JocKWX326S2cUVDODC0Nx q5cHSN67xDgN9qpk+2YM4rVjv/L9CzRb9+Dd61Ma4yjUPpB8OC3a3CFk+A/Wo3iMj2WX LSqE6sMV9FbmfXdVI4pxuxwn9UzlRyzR3YUyMClHToNYgpmwtduYNBnPNg4+jc8X+QlF pGqFiOo7M1qNxse5WFZEAWIwLwTmE3b/1ogKgw536M8ALvw7KAAFvFBvqLGQMYGNT0H3 0ONg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=AaK4gTEc3xivbVgXcrCo77AgfxH9KY+//Ri4fwvWfH0=; b=UOhNjr3zY71Ykzr28QRZcdisJ1Z+//twmRuH874PqGoD5gaNkyt9JeLnOG8fi+OlCT /DGDobFxDHvsllDlO7SsAXc4QL5XvDe7yB1UL0mc6FN/EgMOuOimuCQ08YdZC+fAlSJU /ULdDRil7uXmJArPAB/mn+U7xMFuVEa4yGKeLqpCizNwbN3Zns1gKLYFEqCaYpezP6rH F0QKM9Bs4WkSnhz04hybN49FsXGD9fx9l2vL/xoJMWkUZtNvapLHZsFboX5B7QIPxX56 F0eOt09sMR+NaYIWkAp3EJm5Y5kUW6ZnEx8CwSXCQfI3hCgoJNuYfsKYBRCvDCOWDI2Q eVEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=mMwM11zl; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id en10-20020a056402528a00b0049d65039735si7854956edb.420.2023.01.16.02.49.02; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:49:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=mMwM11zl; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229881AbjAPKn7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 05:43:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53246 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231177AbjAPKne (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 05:43:34 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25EB319686 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E924676B5; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:42:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1673865775; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AaK4gTEc3xivbVgXcrCo77AgfxH9KY+//Ri4fwvWfH0=; b=mMwM11zl4eBlHy+Ri65hhs2BgDS8SpGO1DAIXuqDGYHqcBm1glGj3jsNB/xQVC9GAC6bw3 rErv3Cnb5AiQhVjlbdA8SJOdOqSM1ZzdPlW/J14ikvRXReCWjO+YPtbCLF/6W3HPP8UAcN Rws5E7W2upuzx8Zolf2Z9bx86t4BTNg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1673865775; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AaK4gTEc3xivbVgXcrCo77AgfxH9KY+//Ri4fwvWfH0=; b=e+Timl99VYEa7kr+TfZNDnrYiY41yKeyDNva1RS+5A16CplMOV18xyw6DZXmQToIcmfgRM mHrKWeyYSr6+CRCw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72331138FE; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id SYjhGy8qxWOPWQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:42:55 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D463DA0746; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:42:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:42:54 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Patrik Schindler Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Ted Tso Subject: Re: ext4: Remove deprecated noacl/nouser_xattr options Message-ID: <20230116104254.xpphncpzu3zf53va@quack3> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Sun 15-01-23 23:56:21, Patrik Schindler wrote: > sorry for contacting you directly, but I struggle to find relevant > information on this topic. This is best discussed on ext4 development mailing list (added to CC). > In this web page is documented that "noacl" for ext4 is deprecated. > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/patch/1658977369-2478-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com/ > > Do you have some background information at hand why noacl is deprecated, > and how to get the functionality of noacl after this change? Yes, these options were deprecated for a long time (10 years) and now they are removed since nobody complained. The reasoning is in commit f70486055ee ("ext4: try to deprecate noacl and noxattr_user mount options"): No other file system allows ACL's and extended attributes to be enabled or disabled via a mount option. So let's try to deprecate these options from ext4. - And it makes sense to me. It looks a bit strange and dangerous to disable (part of) permission checks for the files. What usecase did you have for it? Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR