Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp6740221rwb; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:49:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtVccBTh3WBLIN5azre/tJcRgWu+CczFEE2vobOIwig/zhatDwwgTo0h94xsSdaApphihUD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:5485:b0:b3:5196:9505 with SMTP id i5-20020a056a20548500b000b351969505mr9982424pzk.30.1674060551036; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:49:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1674060551; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LMcY+nOtSlY/Qal69oBsV3bTFoA/jGlgd4FiIgtYxgmeKNSC+mXdSjafF9hYRggX9h 1Q+sRD18nGzpkSQOGZaaTfQuZg31F912PpS76bQR4e/0jun3Xnv+WOltapdeFDPp/Wok Xs5yOadcJdzTNqSVxCCE23HZNezGIkds9Uqkc4kLW3Ftdw3zHy7lUtxLp1lp6TlXiWLd D9XYFKdQuhersQlgDIbwkb02dTg9DA3k9GaqFC20BsI7DC3P7uU3z6hYXUuuPy5FlIIm unZClhAct96FJOTzQWLmiY5x6N0/j4VoNBu+ynvK2owPYUHemHaTaRt7rcKCbC96ofiO iMOg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=6tNDSNkFiJEqqIZ//J/1DmHsVFKzcFqD4Ly/ZSfJnDY=; b=n3qNTFcuXxJh5yEGXQGTq+vpPbmeGiYK4WoYi20kvDkg2wOSFhBtWtGOhUa/8UWG8s 83/fJOBpDaxgiawzUMVATOrkoaT4SZkGyUap9Fap/TE1XiQgcXJ8K/9X4TaG7lBHIEdM Gw9BOEObd/o7hNe+tUgknZAyNLqQbSCQO07avrk1YuAZpCxwcGMxySjSvC5bpBk7Hx55 Qj0rR7mEVKbii0QSG4NTid6lN1h1ME5W/KcNd6Ssi/1UoyzipQXHvFxWHC13RVKDjIET l1yKcLPn3kO7rJExOB5nwX6hNYCFF+O9tGlLe7c/d/vyZ8qCZOIiJ8tc/x3hMUxqoNf/ 5MpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u185-20020a6385c2000000b004b668a36b0bsi5769681pgd.492.2023.01.18.08.48.55; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:49:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230302AbjARQna (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47346 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230339AbjARQnH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:07 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA6C37558; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:42:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 7BA7A67373; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:42:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:42:08 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ryusuke Konishi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , Hugh Dickins , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm: return an ERR_PTR from __filemap_get_folio Message-ID: <20230118164208.GA7584@lst.de> References: <20230118094329.9553-1-hch@lst.de> <20230118094329.9553-10-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 09:39:08PM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > > Also pass through the error through the direct callers: > > > filemap_get_folio, filemap_lock_folio filemap_grab_folio > > and filemap_get_incore_folio. > > As for the comments describing the return values of these callers, > isn't it necessary to rewrite the value from NULL in case of errors ? Yes, thanks for catching this.