Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:28:15 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
        oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mm: return an ERR_PTR from __filemap_get_folio
Message-ID: <20230121142815.GA6786@lst.de>
References: <20230121065755.1140136-8-hch@lst.de> <202301211944.5T9l1RgA-lkp@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202301211944.5T9l1RgA-lkp@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 07:52:54PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

And I don't love all this hugging when something doesn't work.  It feels
passive aggressive.

That being said, in this case the error is becaue the series is against
linux-next, so applying it to mainline won't work.