Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C650C636CD for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 12:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231624AbjBAMpp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 07:45:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56744 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231668AbjBAMpo (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 07:45:44 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f198.google.com (mail-il1-f198.google.com [209.85.166.198]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD712DE4F for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:45:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-f198.google.com with SMTP id k7-20020a056e02156700b0030f025aeca3so11343139ilu.12 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 04:45:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:from:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V5gRBWvCrC4ivORDLYanYAKruxMNDrxF3nhXlCgZ6d4=; b=b/4w3Z/85tQVX9mXlKD+p9dlmYuAVr/yb7GGORazQhem52e0XUrl2QoJgEB7bkLTqa e96Fa0Mw71is8R3s2+Rg33VaOzh/R+Ij58cHjSPqIrdVW18j3OfokPjY/q/NzQNSketG kNm+zjc+ptGQGHD6q0xlj39PVjm9/Ouzhg0Hnd0VlrWBa4mHvFxlc8yZYfFZLPkmFywI je40lxoSxCl2DTfhgTXzvbURIrWtE/TPB+FJ+39qPAXjVlrwesmifpetsLXznMyjXLxE Rs+zHMXFQPlhqWr+eJOWGrbG8n4wVBHRl8D5k7GQcQe2bQogtzhmhb3CgkdpOZBZB3M0 1Bnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXVBE9vYgJq4NSoljApgIMSej/UJpnL6hebbw8YsJ/AYn2gkpYF tTb52yj0489yha6w0Eet+HD0izbSNCh4vKmdvQIEvUg7bWh0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8i4uvYg6+GpTdMSIzx6vtF835rmgFlCdJGSpv7rq6MO3NDFTCc1cgEiGwQuSXfchipNn98YjYUH3i1f67LYl1nHTfNNSY5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:3a0f:b0:3a9:611a:928b with SMTP id cn15-20020a0566383a0f00b003a9611a928bmr461546jab.55.1675255539387; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 04:45:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 04:45:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: <0000000000006c411605e2f127e5@google.com> X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <0000000000005555f005f3a2d3da@google.com> Subject: Re: kernel BUG in ext4_free_blocks (2) From: syzbot To: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joneslee@google.com, lczerner@redhat.com, lee@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nogikh@google.com, sashal@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-android-bugs@googlegroups.com, tadeusz.struk@linaro.org, tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, tytso@mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org This bug is marked as fixed by commit: ext4: block range must be validated before use in ext4_mb_clear_bb() But I can't find it in the tested trees[1] for more than 90 days. Is it a correct commit? Please update it by replying: #syz fix: exact-commit-title Until then the bug is still considered open and new crashes with the same signature are ignored. Kernel: Android 5.10 Dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=15cd994e273307bf5cfa --- [1] I expect the commit to be present in: 1. android12-5.10-lts branch of https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common