Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5594C61DA4 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 11:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230294AbjBIL5n (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 06:57:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59010 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229952AbjBIL4P (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 06:56:15 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A67C45C498; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 03:46:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.169]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4PCFSg6Qshz4f3k5d; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 19:46:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAn3rEQ3eRjgb0tDQ--.53508S16; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 19:46:30 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 14/21] ext4: remove ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan dead check in ext4_mb_check_limits Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 03:48:18 +0800 Message-Id: <20230209194825.511043-15-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20230209194825.511043-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230209194825.511043-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAn3rEQ3eRjgb0tDQ--.53508S16 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7KrW5tF1rZrW3CryUCr17Wrg_yoW8WF4rpF srCFyUW34xWr1a9wsrK3Z8W3WrKw4fKF1xJryS9r1rAF17X3yqka9xtFyUZF9Fyrs3Z3Z3 ZFyYqr4UGw4Ika7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBIb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUAVCq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAv FVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE 3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr2 1l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv 67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2 Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s02 6x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0x vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26F4j6r4UJwCI42IY 6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVC2z280aV CY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU0TqcUUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Only call trace of ext4_mb_check_limits is as following: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group ext4_mb_measure_extent ext4_mb_check_limits(ac, e4b, 0); ext4_mb_check_limits(ac, e4b, 1); If the first ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_max_to_scan check in ext4_mb_check_limits is met, we will set ac_status to AC_STATUS_BREAK and call ext4_mb_try_best_found to try to use ac->ac_b_ex. If ext4_mb_try_best_found successes, then block allocation finishs, the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check is not reachable. If ext4_mb_try_best_found fails, then we set EXT4_MB_HINT_FIRST and reset ac->ac_b_ex to retry block allocation. We will use any found free extent in ext4_mb_measure_extent before reach the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check. In summary, the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check is not reachable and we can remove that dead check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 0fdbf16ac180..e53f84de5018 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -2039,8 +2039,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, if (bex->fe_len < gex->fe_len) return; - if ((finish_group || ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan) - && bex->fe_group == e4b->bd_group) { + if (finish_group && bex->fe_group == e4b->bd_group) { /* recheck chunk's availability - we don't know * when it was found (within this lock-unlock * period or not) */ -- 2.30.0