Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DDAC636CC for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231137AbjBMTyD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:54:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58324 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229821AbjBMTyC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:54:02 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC96D1C7ED; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:54:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31DJS1YK020911; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=XwhyzVfxPNRV8QVCyflPLlqVnFnZ6biKS8WtqpnJN3w=; b=Sv4ysFd8QYSe3mSa6XT9M0Tb49Sbdpcu+ZKYoQQv9wVrYH2Ym5vEKfNv1dzidD3b5qls dEf7qOOw6UIUkpVFiStcbs8l0PDPW/sxL+Drbto9lqqp9YD74zfXfG1XQHsFEak2CNJ/ CRihJ/NMzP0h0eRfA67NtUr9XwXFEGyul7QnZx+tnEGFFUorxHU82kN6XG/IVTD6bGGq iFhWdZGlg+TkGisONow7Gxqzp/xT13rC458WhlbIPUhZ2EQJ5C9VNfpV5tc/6eZQHbcW FV6KCeO/aYpYDdMWj89+5Hy4JkBN8s/8Fs/TAu6AovF/NqAQK6D4c6pXeb/WooY6V3+m EQ== Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nqucp8ed4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31DCxTAp017665; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:51 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3np2n6k2fv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:51 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 31DJrmHK31981826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:48 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA56320043; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6A420040; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.20.198]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:53:46 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:23:44 +0530 From: Ojaswin Mujoo To: Kemeng Shi Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] ext4: use best found when complex scan of group finishs Message-ID: References: <20230209194825.511043-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> <20230209194825.511043-16-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230209194825.511043-16-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: UqAKeK9IYfmDr5zc0WsIlo6SByR2vlxO X-Proofpoint-GUID: UqAKeK9IYfmDr5zc0WsIlo6SByR2vlxO X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-02-13_12,2023-02-13_01,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302130171 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:48:19AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > If any bex which meets bex->fe_len >= gex->fe_len is found, then it will > always be used when complex scan of group that bex belongs to finishs. > So there will not be any lock-unlock period. > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 14 ++------------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index e53f84de5018..c684758d6dbb 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -2019,8 +2019,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); > struct ext4_free_extent *bex = &ac->ac_b_ex; > struct ext4_free_extent *gex = &ac->ac_g_ex; > - struct ext4_free_extent ex; > - int max; > > if (ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND) > return; > @@ -2039,16 +2037,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > if (bex->fe_len < gex->fe_len) > return; > > - if (finish_group && bex->fe_group == e4b->bd_group) { > - /* recheck chunk's availability - we don't know > - * when it was found (within this lock-unlock > - * period or not) */ > - max = mb_find_extent(e4b, bex->fe_start, gex->fe_len, &ex); > - if (max >= gex->fe_len) { > - ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b); > - return; > - } > - } > + if (finish_group) > + ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b); > } > > /* > -- > 2.30.0 > Looks good. So when we have found bex > gex, then we wont have a lock unlock period since we always allocate the bex when we reach the end of group. Just a small typo in the commit message (finshs -> finishes), but other than that feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo