Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162FCC636D4 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230437AbjBMUPG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:15:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51064 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230359AbjBMUPF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:15:05 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A1953596; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31DKDUxI027051; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : content-type : in-reply-to : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=6/Zk3u+w5hzNg6S+Sv/5QXb+RTN+bmwB6vvGSyIVakU=; b=EP0qNvd1OAnBn1Jw3XAsHHkry1Bo+U1FmmhUELHqrsKZdeJohcLFKobIhA8pQEK7l0FR 9Q5urludjZuwHBhOFw9zOLsE/PWAQFa1qX2hngk/GqwmKjHwEay2zI1vd2E7NHkXzqn5 /VcbbTDX43S9tKPgJKBuYoyj40A7G1AoQ4uyeBntqPgSIsPiWHn0XommwckX2hX3tPfI TjiE2ziTe/SKOZ5WcOFJ68pEunOAW0ty+veo8jqkRAVHbm+9MN96Iifnf3VwEA+LpVjg MYqpP8ieQ0wZ2QxStis4MfIqNqHbvzniHMOmx8hQ27pIC7NFGUvrpb+cR6aRKU6S0xVN PQ== Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nqv2880ff-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31D8lIlG007609; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3np2n6aa38-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.106]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 31DKEq4j47513972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:52 GMT Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9E720043; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7342920040; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.20.198]) by smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:14:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:44:47 +0530 From: Ojaswin Mujoo To: Kemeng Shi Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/21] ext4: get correct ext4_group_info in ext4_mb_prefetch_fini Message-ID: References: <20230209194825.511043-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> <20230209194825.511043-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> <51940a4e-b01d-cef8-af35-87788df483f1@huaweicloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51940a4e-b01d-cef8-af35-87788df483f1@huaweicloud.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: rhN8jIH5oK3VMVGPTLXshpJ3lYhNMMPc X-Proofpoint-GUID: rhN8jIH5oK3VMVGPTLXshpJ3lYhNMMPc X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-02-13_12,2023-02-13_01,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302130176 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 08:27:32PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > > > on 2/13/2023 3:03 PM, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:48:08AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > >> We always get ext4_group_desc with group + 1 and ext4_group_info with > >> group to check if we need do initialize ext4_group_info for the group. > >> Just get ext4_group_desc with group for ext4_group_info initialization > >> check. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi > >> --- > >> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 +++--- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > >> index 352ac9139fee..f24f80ecf318 100644 > >> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > >> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > >> @@ -2570,13 +2570,13 @@ void ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group, > >> unsigned int nr) > >> { > >> while (nr-- > 0) { > >> - struct ext4_group_desc *gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, group, > >> - NULL); > >> - struct ext4_group_info *grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group); > >> + struct ext4_group_desc *gdp; > >> + struct ext4_group_info *grp; > >> > >> if (!group) > >> group = ext4_get_groups_count(sb); > >> group--; > >> + gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, group, NULL); > >> grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group); > >> > >> if (EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(grp) && > >> -- > >> 2.30.0 > >> > > > > This is a duplicate of [1] :) > > > > But I'm okay with this going in as that patchseries might take some time > > to get merged. Feel free to add: > > > > Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/85bbcb3774e38de65b737ef0000241ddbdda73aa.1674822311.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com > > > Hi Ojaswin, Thank you so much to review my code. I 'm sorry that I didn't > notice this patch is duplicated and I really appreciate that you allow this > one to get merged first. I will add your sign to this patch in next version. > Thanks! Hi Kemeng, So I'm not sure what the norm is when dealing with such duplicate patches, but if you do plan to add the Signed-off-by then I'd just like to point out that the patch I linked is mainly from Ritesh Harjani, so you can pick his Signed-off-by rather than mine. Thanks, ojaswin > > -- > Best wishes > Kemeng Shi >