Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76617C61DA4 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229797AbjBPNOD (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:14:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229574AbjBPNNp (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:13:45 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984653B0FD; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:13:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id d13-20020a17090ad3cd00b0023127b2d602so2106253pjw.2; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:13:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3QV6dagoaFtxVNP4EIl0deHoYTOELIU5lXZHFOYxb/Y=; b=H0OuOoKdSQ7+ltWg1cLBRqi3r6aP/4xfnwMjUIcMI7UepfAdqldXYGDBFbl4ZTJgvR 7gQASmcg/K1369yitsezhQQkOPllQ37s2vHJsjjMvBWt536beKUX99CLVOtfGgLDRylx j1lbQd8rTLUMJP93F2iD6QJij2+PqI0xFnLPe5/8fEVvaOytDb+h0urWY+5y3Z/U0gBC WdwlQBjaNn5KZzAVXWAhF2W4Eccsq6QoIJ3L+SZpq20eqKIG6J0FHRlw3Og7ZzNzfvyE XsE6r/nXdC3n3Qxt2MY7uyLdYuoondAHc0iyhhg+UlumobBRhnGDHwtnw4H9MHI7UeOJ 9veA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3QV6dagoaFtxVNP4EIl0deHoYTOELIU5lXZHFOYxb/Y=; b=VZbzY8ernlSrc3xrExraoxxKla3MR4MYtV3c4ob7fLQANIUiH0b4SiwVheVOq5ag+x rvILB9ohtZeu0SW/OJQB5ikUinN5t9AOfOjNI3hr0HjZy2/0RqoVvMVYCZKaLfcs0JzB /lHG3rlY5v2YNJu9JC5PPmuil6nfWAQD1WeHVv0v2qfceF+dCpC0tue1RwoVVgzkGkRU 6Y8TAXKSaKuR/kdNeN7au2u1rS+OGLNxhhfmQDMjdXRROjTyXgsiJSIXg+dbvFOy3iKE 1nfPh9fADfHnnjXRuLfkYwWG78NfNX5SR4+uO87gF3Y6yEeb7kgvdikAlATtrepGgPCT tpAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW3yG+3lQiU/RkRahPz8CYo6xCKmXcHBzmgjMYE740qstQQKZjZ 7WCLAwOP9ab9GVbFg6siRug= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+I+GjxCYAMAuv1Z43P/O8C/6Lq3CFcdbt8bu0xadjMzcGQ68Hpgs9bKSFfUsDhU6dbMpARvA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a012:b0:c7:1d82:838c with SMTP id p18-20020a056a20a01200b000c71d82838cmr2361598pzj.41.1676553221979; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rh-tp ([2406:7400:63:5056:148f:873b:4bc8:1e77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2-20020aa78582000000b005a8cc32b23csm93636pfn.20.2023.02.16.05.13.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:13:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:43:22 +0530 Message-Id: <87fsb5lpn1.fsf@doe.com> From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) To: Jinke Han , tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, Jinke Han Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: make dioread_nolock consistent in each mapping round In-Reply-To: <20230207124136.88222-1-hanjinke.666@bytedance.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Jinke Han writes: > From: Jinke Han > > When disable and enable dioread_nolock by remount, we may see > dioread_lock in ext4_do_writepages while see dioread_nolock in > mpage_map_one_extent. This inconsistency may triger the warning > in ext4_add_complete_io when the io_end->handle is NULL. Although > this warning is harmless in most cases, there is still a risk of > insufficient log reservation in conversion of unwritten extents. > Sorry, I haven't completely gone through the patch yet. But this idea of caching the initial value of mount parameter and passing it do different functions while an I/O request completes, is not looking right to me. If that's the case shouldn't we disallow this mount option to change until all the outstanding I/O's are done or complete? Then we need not cache the value of dioread_nolock at the start of writepages and continue to pass it down in case it it changes. Just my initial thoughts. -ritesh > Signed-off-by: Jinke Han > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi > --- > fs/ext4/inode.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index 40579ef513b7..122a22ccddb3 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -1568,6 +1568,7 @@ struct mpage_da_data { > struct ext4_io_submit io_submit; /* IO submission data */ > unsigned int do_map:1; > unsigned int scanned_until_end:1; > + unsigned int dioread_nolock:1; > }; > > static void mpage_release_unused_pages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd, > @@ -2391,7 +2392,7 @@ static int mpage_map_one_extent(handle_t *handle, struct mpage_da_data *mpd) > struct inode *inode = mpd->inode; > struct ext4_map_blocks *map = &mpd->map; > int get_blocks_flags; > - int err, dioread_nolock; > + int err, dioread_nolock = mpd->dioread_nolock; > > trace_ext4_da_write_pages_extent(inode, map); > /* > @@ -2412,7 +2413,6 @@ static int mpage_map_one_extent(handle_t *handle, struct mpage_da_data *mpd) > get_blocks_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE | > EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL | > EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_SUBMIT; > - dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode); > if (dioread_nolock) > get_blocks_flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT; > if (map->m_flags & BIT(BH_Delay)) > @@ -2727,10 +2727,11 @@ static int ext4_do_writepages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd) > handle_t *handle = NULL; > struct inode *inode = mpd->inode; > struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping; > - int needed_blocks, rsv_blocks = 0, ret = 0; > + int needed_blocks, rsv_blocks = 0, rsv = 0, ret = 0; > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(mapping->host->i_sb); > struct blk_plug plug; > bool give_up_on_write = false; > + bool dioread_nolock; > > trace_ext4_writepages(inode, wbc); > > @@ -2783,15 +2784,6 @@ static int ext4_do_writepages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd) > ext4_journal_stop(handle); > } > > - if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) { > - /* > - * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in > - * the page and we may dirty the inode. > - */ > - rsv_blocks = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode, > - PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits); > - } > - > if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX) > range_whole = 1; > > @@ -2837,6 +2829,18 @@ static int ext4_do_writepages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd) > goto unplug; > > while (!mpd->scanned_until_end && wbc->nr_to_write > 0) { > + dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode); > + if (!rsv && dioread_nolock) { > + /* > + * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in > + * the page and we may dirty the inode. > + */ > + rsv = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode, > + PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits); > + } > + rsv_blocks = dioread_nolock ? rsv : 0; > + mpd->dioread_nolock = dioread_nolock; > + > /* For each extent of pages we use new io_end */ > mpd->io_submit.io_end = ext4_init_io_end(inode, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!mpd->io_submit.io_end) { > -- > 2.20.1