Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp591151rwl; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Zhrxk4xynqgfWLg/VxsvXF6yxUT6SOWWwAwvYxlaOXxVZDqpq/1X45ugKq7tN3HgsSC6sx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e8a:b0:930:bcee:eed with SMTP id p10-20020a1709060e8a00b00930bcee0eedmr21138296ejf.9.1680095408242; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1680095408; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wHC7LYtJR6mI0Yw350/QGjL5if7jpY+lI4qeHhNL3abx3zP6vXjb8w1DHzNoSkjtcE YwY2FiVl18VDH2C/j6rQmKBH3swlErO4zFvZnuUlenlitZ2qX8e0NbXRuAOMjyfJ8qAX Ca3efrdCM0m35odBJjLIvmXfGSlZr8uF4hFvCl55dsrdyaOLJc5AF1xF7F4JOoRBQALh uMaIGoPKHVwSLum/+MyPm9WMguYws7NUU2N6uRul4qeVTCMnB2KkUkkrsRt8fEg4YJpu XAqKP9jlABbHgXX9Otg6pnhtyGn45dzaIdtjbUS7YEAnKH0+TzeN1XoLBwVAVeQG9KhZ XI1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=vuqiwL5WOHhi9vY4nLsSMA4hwqodR1/I22u11aU6o8o=; b=gePI7n960/BlIsua9cfYurgyb5OkpmYdaJR3a5ciMoArLYDXfU5rcZ7bdlhjjplKFt 7mBX24jSHbxUwfEA3xCxoizNw/M/vRdBXNx5VL8V+em54eewSByRRQ3KWjybleTpLYmL VpbrQN6qHX3NMaVRQ8yC2FXsNK8q3DRM5R62c1ZPMv9yyNP22lKN/Z7mvYuplM+zxT+i Vrgnb0Sth2cgANbm9tNPsEUNw4h+NLJtxRsaLkFQFmFXDPaSYgk9HR3HQElCKJQCzSxT 3OmCyuvZYBk5SAKqdbCwk9JY92Fm7mlzyJzCn/+qtTZdTWcrsRBmt9w+V4YolQ3hhu1u KgAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=3XzsDcmR; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=NhrqOAit; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n7-20020a05640204c700b004d2785fd4b3si32978430edw.348.2023.03.29.06.09.38; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=3XzsDcmR; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=NhrqOAit; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229892AbjC2NHD (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:07:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53938 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229720AbjC2NHA (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:07:00 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3611A4C28; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11359219A6; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:06:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1680095196; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vuqiwL5WOHhi9vY4nLsSMA4hwqodR1/I22u11aU6o8o=; b=3XzsDcmRODNZh63PhpIc8D2uvzhHz2mBrGx8DYc1FZJSY45CKVPBtD5WcjVu6JgZ5D8An7 9cVDmfWVkGW/sApFemF2uumxnK82oO+oQ2lMhYjzqX/i143P5CX/gB8xrLFGoHoKIIItwG 2S/FvxFeO1IYFCeAzEV3jw1dlt2JwCU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1680095196; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vuqiwL5WOHhi9vY4nLsSMA4hwqodR1/I22u11aU6o8o=; b=NhrqOAitaVTTwcKrGvNi5GrfzJdBMgw6wu/78KlHqBwG4N/S6gBAWv6WHGhu28z6ygpQaL ljG7HUQmlN0VS5DQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3471139D3; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 9vVWO9s3JGQEBwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:06:35 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 75A4DA071E; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:06:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:06:35 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Baokun Li Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: fix race between writepages and remount Message-ID: <20230329130635.utcb3mzekp5izu3q@quack3> References: <20230329085036.2755843-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230329085036.2755843-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed 29-03-23 16:50:36, Baokun Li wrote: > We got a WARNING in ext4_add_complete_io: > ================================================================== > WARNING: at fs/ext4/page-io.c:231 ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 > CPU: 10 PID: 77 Comm: ksoftirqd/10 Tainted: 6.3.0-rc2 #85 > RIP: 0010:ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 [ext4] > [...] > Call Trace: > > ext4_end_bio+0xa8/0x240 [ext4] > bio_endio+0x195/0x310 > blk_update_request+0x184/0x770 > scsi_end_request+0x2f/0x240 > scsi_io_completion+0x75/0x450 > scsi_finish_command+0xef/0x160 > scsi_complete+0xa3/0x180 > blk_complete_reqs+0x60/0x80 > blk_done_softirq+0x25/0x40 > __do_softirq+0x119/0x4c8 > run_ksoftirqd+0x42/0x70 > smpboot_thread_fn+0x136/0x3c0 > kthread+0x140/0x1a0 > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 > ================================================================== > > Above issue may happen as follows: > > cpu1 cpu2 > ----------------------------|---------------------------- > mount -o dioread_lock > ext4_writepages > ext4_do_writepages > *if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))* > // rsv_blocks is not assigned here > mount -o remount,dioread_nolock > ext4_journal_start_with_reserve > __ext4_journal_start > __ext4_journal_start_sb > jbd2__journal_start > *if (rsv_blocks)* > // h_rsv_handle is not initialized here > mpage_map_and_submit_extent > mpage_map_one_extent > dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode) > if (dioread_nolock && (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN)) > mpd->io_submit.io_end->handle = handle->h_rsv_handle > ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag > io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN > // now io_end->handle is NULL but has EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag > > scsi_finish_command > scsi_io_completion > scsi_io_completion_action > scsi_end_request > blk_update_request > req_bio_endio > bio_endio > bio->bi_end_io > ext4_end_bio > ext4_put_io_end_defer > ext4_add_complete_io > // trigger WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal); > > The immediate cause of this problem is that ext4_should_dioread_nolock() > function returns inconsistent values in the ext4_do_writepages() and > mpage_map_one_extent(). There are four conditions in this function that > can be changed at mount time to cause this problem. These four conditions > can be divided into two categories: > > (1) journal_data and EXT4_EXTENTS_FL, which can be changed by ioctl > (2) DELALLOC and DIOREAD_NOLOCK, which can be changed by remount > > The two in the first category have been fixed by commit c8585c6fcaf2 > ("ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages") > and commit cb85f4d23f79 ("ext4: fix race between writepages and enabling > EXT4_EXTENTS_FL") respectively. > > Two cases in the other category have not yet been fixed, and the above > issue is caused by this situation. We refer to the fix for the first > category, when applying options during remount, we grab s_writepages_rwsem > to avoid racing with writepages ops to trigger this problem. > > Fixes: 6b523df4fb5a ("ext4: use transaction reservation for extent conversion in ext4_end_io") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Looks good. Nice that you've spotted also the restore options case. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > V1->V2: > Grab s_writepages_rwsem unconditionally during remount. > Remove patches 1,2 that are no longer needed. > V2->V3: > Also grab s_writepages_rwsem when restoring options. > > fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 ++- > fs/ext4/super.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h > index 9b2cfc32cf78..5f5ee0c20673 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h > @@ -1703,7 +1703,8 @@ struct ext4_sb_info { > > /* > * Barrier between writepages ops and changing any inode's JOURNAL_DATA > - * or EXTENTS flag. > + * or EXTENTS flag or between writepages ops and changing DELALLOC or > + * DIOREAD_NOLOCK mount options on remount. > */ > struct percpu_rw_semaphore s_writepages_rwsem; > struct dax_device *s_daxdev; > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index e6d84c1e34a4..8396da483c17 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -6403,7 +6403,16 @@ static int __ext4_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb) > > } > > + /* > + * Changing the DIOREAD_NOLOCK or DELALLOC mount options may cause > + * two calls to ext4_should_dioread_nolock() to return inconsistent > + * values, triggering WARN_ON in ext4_add_complete_io(). we grab > + * here s_writepages_rwsem to avoid race between writepages ops and > + * remount. > + */ > + percpu_down_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); > ext4_apply_options(fc, sb); > + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); > > if ((old_opts.s_mount_opt & EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM) ^ > test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)) { > @@ -6614,6 +6623,7 @@ static int __ext4_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb) > return 0; > > restore_opts: > + percpu_down_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); > sb->s_flags = old_sb_flags; > sbi->s_mount_opt = old_opts.s_mount_opt; > sbi->s_mount_opt2 = old_opts.s_mount_opt2; > @@ -6622,6 +6632,8 @@ static int __ext4_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb) > sbi->s_commit_interval = old_opts.s_commit_interval; > sbi->s_min_batch_time = old_opts.s_min_batch_time; > sbi->s_max_batch_time = old_opts.s_max_batch_time; > + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); > + > if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY) && sbi->s_system_blks) > ext4_release_system_zone(sb); > #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR