Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Y/5ovz6HI2Z47jbk@magnolia> <CAOQ4uxj6mNbGQBSpg-KpSiDa2UugBFXki4HhM4DPvXeAQMnRWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230418044641.GD360881@frogsfrogsfrogs> <CAOQ4uxgUOuR80jsAE2DkZhMPVNT_WwnsSX8-GSkZO4=k3VbCsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZD9hPSzEign05MTZ@casper.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZD9hPSzEign05MTZ@casper.infradead.org>
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:02:59 +0300
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjWQT5h7ck_AfEWiHCFNDxRWK45XP2kvxbreMPk5XJeig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next?
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
        lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 6:34=E2=80=AFAM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org=
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:46:32AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:46=E2=80=AFAM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.=
org> wrote:
> > > TBH, most of my fs complaints these days are managerial problems (Are=
 we
> > > spending too much time on LTS?  How on earth do we prioritize project=
s
> > > with all these drive by bots??  Why can't we support large engineerin=
g
> > > efforts better???) than technical.
> >
> > I penciled one session for "FS stable backporting (and other LTS woes)"=
.
> > I made it a cross FS/IO session so we can have this session in the big =
room
> > and you are welcome to pull this discussion to any direction you want.
>
> Would this make sense to include the MM folks as well?  Certainly MM
> has made the same choice as XFS ("No automatic backports, we will cc:
> stable on patches that make sense").

Yeh that makes sense.
Added MM to that session.

Thanks,
Amir.