Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp1050858rwd; Tue, 16 May 2023 11:03:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4Zu8htePiZcFZc+M7BmD+Q2Wae1kBDcGdR5eIt8uue90u6R606jd1E2PHANRXMH4IpuYKc X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6a8e:b0:234:ba34:71bf with SMTP id u14-20020a17090a6a8e00b00234ba3471bfmr38802972pjj.1.1684260188262; Tue, 16 May 2023 11:03:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684260188; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bbfs1FbcbzfLk9a6wFwEXIPpKHQLJUUrnC/lXPQPQ5pX16xLfs/ouf9TTWn4OClgg4 oxIcO4NT0ZwiiUDp7Im9NiRTsYga46bo/oHMFej4QXuFjoXA5OWPgPnE9R5DhnMJWUqo tcm40UZIalwva9zPg/Tuh2Qf/IOzfS7ThFjNIn9KazeJmeg+wNRjzfy7gpZeKGS0pq8N nCEqWzfV686ExfhtmAbb/ueJBLhlyjb2mygy5YfWpyNovL+iNUp3a7s9Su1Kf6/M/XOP MPXGeBVIW7UKJcQFs4cDtJxd+MFGzhG4NfC6IHWirY4B9oEvMHUk3Uli1qQVNBIC3/es NiKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-disposition:mime-version:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=/erDpC8BVnuOTGydUZRBBP9NR8KrL+4iM6uBb52s9Pw=; b=cl/Bl3+6gIfQw1XPCfPkG47KRXEty+1Yrc7cVI1kNbHueceA1N7BOLGMBYwgbNoDrr MrWqcrwxQsCCElq/pW0wShGi9DhVaFEcuY9zj4D3TutCNs/zHMPdQdzko5Hi9JQKpGNX 109Zd9KOgnpz8gSFP4TTa/t4NnDyBSkNJMpbTkzXyelF24wKIqsoyYFLpg0U/+wET1uL zBnR94U9c31oyA4BT2PYD1vaR0uCWWps4kPpRivJ1sksE6EgMYzbMS+UXRaPX98u++lF dkPG9uIVIec7DlIE+t4O2nFwk/z7z6qQXGybM2Ab5KpBBvfEeFCMt67Gu3Nmv+IU0Ikf TQnw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=O8VAduL5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z195-20020a6333cc000000b005304f692247si17125959pgz.458.2023.05.16.11.02.48; Tue, 16 May 2023 11:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=O8VAduL5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229464AbjEPRzC (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 May 2023 13:55:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45018 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231956AbjEPRyo (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2023 13:54:44 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D571FFB for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-62382464ca3so2614846d6.1 for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:54:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684259682; x=1686851682; h=content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/erDpC8BVnuOTGydUZRBBP9NR8KrL+4iM6uBb52s9Pw=; b=O8VAduL5LXb9grUmrNPMbds5I89W7SPmiuNPtvIvCbE9K5tbYKfRaOLTBFBNCPa3d4 4oJIxbvwERK74d0SxeQPaKysH3NXuWlhgp7uIpXqJsC6lY18UYvHihNPUKmLqwYPl2aL bu4RQIgo/VT79ax6HRKoPbgQObrqsEr0zBfG+MV9EjS2qfmPHLUuZ3Ly97gfzPZ2eika XWzIZlrUKZ6ho66RFQ13k0QwCvG1TAZGGB1xTiAQ3NJ+QNjHR79XdlKfa5H3FOGYXg9j t9j8DRknSj+vfRmx9lcM8Yvhs+uFfG/21VIb3YY8atNxFpUSNfFrekCPMUTB76MqMarI ptUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684259682; x=1686851682; h=content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/erDpC8BVnuOTGydUZRBBP9NR8KrL+4iM6uBb52s9Pw=; b=hdo6H1KuLAjkXgeVUn8REsi5vlKkS4Q2vyk0X7kitVKvl9Qzi7+YEYIt5blB4OLMwM H+5GvlWutielC58GC8u4cE1Pk+HSZ2NaG6+GOM4qzq5I0k2hIoHuvaO71VMzeTNsiHw9 j090xXdWtwMVRJdE5Tp20ctR4tfxQ+c5Cvx8zv4AyOqM0MuyYlvi0PIFoYiOEvTUk+fY FrVjSR9IXjpmnrOfgpgKTgFs/eB0BnUMf4FKscSTBEjD0l/fsLFOjLMyc67O6Kne/PPH /9nfaRN3dW5wSmIX3dbQmaSIGlbcogfXqnMk/Aj22BVsazTYPn7j2qvLXsU3I+I/J56c ijBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxYQCIMNBa32DkD6JfmzGcQh1/YRwL5QlbY7gSv0n5ngnDhfWlt RfT6b8TJagMTdDDpwCnTcO4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5193:b0:5ef:4446:22f1 with SMTP id kl19-20020a056214519300b005ef444622f1mr55015698qvb.19.1684259682124; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 (h64-35-202-119.cntcnh.broadband.dynamic.tds.net. [64.35.202.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f8-20020a0cf3c8000000b0061b67ae2ff9sm5794769qvm.121.2023.05.16.10.54.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 May 2023 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 13:54:39 -0400 From: Eric Whitney To: tytso@mit.edu Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: 6.4-rc2 xfstests-bld nojournal regression - generic/231 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Hi Ted: I'm seeing an apparent test regression on 6.4-rc2 while running the nojournal test case with kvm-xfstests. This is generic/231, which fails with 40% reliability (or better) for me in 10 trial runs. I'm not seeing failures in the other test cases, including 0 failures in a 10 trial run on 4k. The relevant output from 231.full is: ltp/fsx -q -l 64000000 -o 65536 -N 20000 -S 12221 /vdc/fsx_file1 All 20000 operations completed A-OK! ltp/fsx -q -l 64000000 -o 65536 -N 20000 -S 30719 /vdc/fsx_file1 ltp/fsx -q -l 64000000 -o 65536 -N 20000 -S 7219 /vdc/fsx_file2 ltp/fsx -q -l 64000000 -o 65536 -N 20000 -S 29252 /vdc/fsx_file3 ltp/fsx -q -l 64000000 -o 65536 -N 20000 -S 7909 /vdc/fsx_file4 All 20000 operations completed A-OK! All 20000 operations completed A-OK! All 20000 operations completed A-OK! All 20000 operations completed A-OK! ltp/fsx -f -q -l 64000000 -o 65536 -N 20000 -S 6375 /vdc/fsx_file1 All 20000 operations completed A-OK! _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdc is inconsistent *** fsck.ext4 output *** fsck from util-linux 2.36.1 e2fsck 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 17 passes checks, but checksum does not match inode. Fix? no Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information /dev/vdc: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors ********** This test failure bisects to: a44be64bbecb ("ext4: don't clear SB_RDONLY when remounting r/w until quota is re-enabled"). Reverting this patch eliminates the test failure (passes 100/100 trials). Eric