Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp4154747rwd; Tue, 23 May 2023 04:06:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7INOK3WHVv6BnmJNGEogMfX1jQIYJ137aZ6XymC1KYydv8JW6suRj0CvuVv4gNkiMClevl X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3703:b0:107:1f22:10d2 with SMTP id yl3-20020a056a21370300b001071f2210d2mr11359713pzb.20.1684839998674; Tue, 23 May 2023 04:06:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684839998; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CEcMAtoVExD7dSeSN++Y0i2BcCKbfmMWrlz91nlB8famwuPJMNsgh2FsLsFnxkqSya ouNa25O75yxiwTjfp1UUuxtWnw21eoYXQJig7ezTjiVVjRmSNSdnIjUkmwIBZhKGnMfn f4hPNLiWlFIbFVzP97M2vONUoKkfhKWc8YvnrmJdnG959T1ULWvak+0x/9/yLfxQX6hI qRIBdlSfWfQKAvzAB9EXnkHoH9wQ3HkEePjAGGdNFqpdHPfzOmABtNDSi7Xxl0sP7eTF o9v53cIta5klQj2NzPR4gK0VgIM04yaHFNDjIkZqvpqaoMkO+d2dPG943WXI76sr/5JT Icrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ul2wiyn3tZXigRRDQsy4PRffjpdIXycPKLQoI/BeBSk=; b=s53yqBHcemP6IDwPpJtnXlQ+05KSD420PHZbWJxID6JN5A81GWf7JH7arXDMFyrxj+ P7xeXCv2NH5WGC4sMu6JaaYTuywNuFnTz6j1w3sdkh8iPilMY1HLReaJRGqV5nE+euAL eqGi/pDGY/1naGqgpffKx9TBqb1OmJVlOb/IQpnVrVsPsdHrV/9aCXjBq5ShXyF7O9ju 8SixBg3Ffr5/bsIFCsu8RAFntyigR5komoWskCwNxWKf24LkcFx+IgS2qsKSghOal2Nj HVZAzUFAtHGMFSfhB52A5W25rBa3HayfuuIMMf9PogIDLxlgD4KxDRTuiASnEJhUmJpY jwwQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=mIkjqP2c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r12-20020a17090a690c00b00250a2c9a793si975127pjj.152.2023.05.23.04.06.24; Tue, 23 May 2023 04:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=mIkjqP2c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236480AbjEWLCK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 May 2023 07:02:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41446 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229525AbjEWLCJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2023 07:02:09 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722A211A; Tue, 23 May 2023 04:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE8A663112; Tue, 23 May 2023 11:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DE74C433D2; Tue, 23 May 2023 11:02:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1684839726; bh=admVir0e1iJsJqH69IN82HGXh7gSprJ1rVfCy0tCXmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mIkjqP2ceO1NATfJK4sOVt+Dljp0t48H0f8K6EMal7QFecmRelDQA+epv0CVInmUs NdpEP+TqAaweKmiBz/g0hmPn+q2PgtWd1fmeNYHhX2sCj/mriLbOxejEM/DrAbJpgJ XS3qPOlNX3FUDyFwGS7mPQZVBWcQzRb/ITAxQJFeXZisA8jVCzhoBtXfSuKr2Ecwla f/DnK84dyvaFGOpX8Ry6t8URYzOb9yAmvCX5tU0nw/ikr/ggmkDIEFEQKv+x7y94wi fA3BjbOzUZGS41BPHwS2nr4n78IkTVnY7z0gN4b8JJ32MbIIobrA9SWPew7NX/iems 384W5UUK+q9FA== Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 13:01:57 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Jeff Layton Cc: Jan Kara , Alexander Viro , "Darrick J. Wong" , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Dave Chinner , Chuck Lever , Amir Goldstein , David Howells , Neil Brown , Matthew Wilcox , Andreas Dilger , Theodore T'so , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Namjae Jeon , Steve French , Sergey Senozhatsky , Tom Talpey , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime Message-ID: <20230523-undicht-antihelden-b1a98aa769be@brauner> References: <20230518114742.128950-1-jlayton@kernel.org> <20230518114742.128950-3-jlayton@kernel.org> <20230523100240.mgeu4y46friv7hau@quack3> <20230523101723.xmy7mylbczhki6aa@quack3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 06:56:11AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 12:17 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Tue 23-05-23 12:02:40, Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Thu 18-05-23 07:47:35, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > The VFS always uses coarse-grained timestamp updates for filling out the > > > > ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing > > > > filesystems to optimize away a lot metadata updates, down to around 1 > > > > per jiffy, even when a file is under heavy writes. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, this has always been an issue when we're exporting via > > > > NFSv3, which relies on timestamps to validate caches. Even with NFSv4, a > > > > lot of exported filesystems don't properly support a change attribute > > > > and are subject to the same problems with timestamp granularity. Other > > > > applications have similar issues (e.g backup applications). > > > > > > > > Switching to always using fine-grained timestamps would improve the > > > > situation, but that becomes rather expensive, as the underlying > > > > filesystem will have to log a lot more metadata updates. > > > > > > > > What we need is a way to only use fine-grained timestamps when they are > > > > being actively queried. > > > > > > > > The kernel always stores normalized ctime values, so only the first 30 > > > > bits of the tv_nsec field are ever used. Whenever the mtime changes, the > > > > ctime must also change. > > > > > > > > Use the 31st bit of the ctime tv_nsec field to indicate that something > > > > has queried the inode for the i_mtime or i_ctime. When this flag is set, > > > > on the next timestamp update, the kernel can fetch a fine-grained > > > > timestamp instead of the usual coarse-grained one. > > > > > > > > This patch adds the infrastructure this scheme. Filesytems can opt > > > > into it by setting the FS_MULTIGRAIN_TS flag in the fstype. > > > > > > > > Later patches will convert individual filesystems over to use it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > > > > > > So there are two things I dislike about this series because I think they > > > are fragile: > > > > > > 1) If we have a filesystem supporting multigrain ts and someone > > > accidentally directly uses the value of inode->i_ctime, he can get bogus > > > value (with QUERIED flag). This mistake is very easy to do. So I think we > > > should rename i_ctime to something like __i_ctime and always use accessor > > > function for it. > > > > > > 2) As I already commented in a previous version of the series, the scheme > > > with just one flag for both ctime and mtime and flag getting cleared in > > > current_time() relies on the fact that filesystems always do an equivalent > > > of: > > > > > > inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(); > > > > > > Otherwise we can do coarse grained update where we should have done a fine > > > grained one. Filesystems often update timestamps like this but not > > > universally. Grepping shows some instances where only inode->i_mtime is set > > > from current_time() e.g. in autofs or bfs. Again a mistake that is rather > > > easy to make and results in subtle issues. I think this would be also > > > nicely solved by renaming i_ctime to __i_ctime and using a function to set > > > ctime. Mtime could then be updated with inode->i_mtime = ctime_peek(). > > > > > > I understand this is quite some churn but a very mechanical one that could > > > be just done with Coccinelle and a few manual fixups. So IMHO it is worth > > > the more robust result. > > > > Also as I'm thinking about it your current scheme is slightly racy. Suppose > > the filesystem does: > > > > CPU1 CPU2 > > > > statx() > > inode->i_ctime = current_time() > > current_mg_time() > > nsec = atomic_long_fetch_andnot(QUERIED, &inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec) > > nsec = atomic_long_fetch_or(QUERIED, &inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec) > > if (nsec & QUERIED) - not set > > ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&now) > > return timestamp_truncate(now, inode); > > - QUERIED flag in the inode->i_ctime gets overwritten by the assignment > > => we need not update ctime due to granularity although it was queried > > > > One more reason to use explicit function to update inode->i_ctime ;) > > When we store the new time in the i_ctime field, the flag gets cleared > because at that point we're storing a new (unseen) time. > > However, you're correct: if the i_ctime in your above example starts at > the same value that is currently being returned by > ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64, then we'll lose the flag set in statx. > > I think the right fix there would be to not update the ctime at all if > it's a coarse grained time, and the value wouldn't have an apparent > change to an observer. That would leave the flag intact. > > That does mean we'd need to move to a function that does clock fetch and > assigns it to i_ctime in one go (like you suggest). Something like: > > inode_update_ctime(inode); > > How we do that with atomic operations over two values (the tv_sec and > tv_nsec) is a bit tricky. I'll have to think about it. > > Christian, given Jan's concerns do you want to drop this series for now > and let me respin it? I deliberately put it into a vfs.unstable.* branch. I would leave it there until you send a new one then drop it. If we get lucky the bots that run on -next will have time to report potential perf issues while it's not currently causing conflicts.