Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/13] ext4: Abstract out logic to search average fragment list
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 17:03:05 +0530
Message-Id: <0ad6ab5b9000b6ce11cbfc64ef0f73684ad85710.1685009579.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1685009579.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
References: <cover.1685009579.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Make the logic of searching average fragment list of a given order reusable
by abstracting it out to a differnet function. This will also avoid
code duplication in upcoming patches.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index b6bb314d778e..fd29ee02685d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -904,6 +904,37 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr0(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Find a suitable group of given order from the average fragments list.
+ */
+static struct ext4_group_info *
+ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, int order)
+{
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
+	struct list_head *frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order];
+	rwlock_t *frag_list_lock = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[order];
+	struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL, *iter;
+	enum criteria cr = ac->ac_criteria;
+
+	if (list_empty(frag_list))
+		return NULL;
+	read_lock(frag_list_lock);
+	if (list_empty(frag_list)) {
+		read_unlock(frag_list_lock);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	list_for_each_entry(iter, frag_list, bb_avg_fragment_size_node) {
+		if (sbi->s_mb_stats)
+			atomic64_inc(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[cr]);
+		if (likely(ext4_mb_good_group(ac, iter->bb_group, cr))) {
+			grp = iter;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	read_unlock(frag_list_lock);
+	return grp;
+}
+
 /*
  * Choose next group by traversing average fragment size list of suitable
  * order. Updates *new_cr if cr level needs an update.
@@ -912,7 +943,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
 {
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
-	struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL, *iter;
+	struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL;
 	int i;
 
 	if (unlikely(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_CR1_OPTIMIZED)) {
@@ -922,23 +953,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 
 	for (i = mb_avg_fragment_size_order(ac->ac_sb, ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
 	     i < MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb); i++) {
-		if (list_empty(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[i]))
-			continue;
-		read_lock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[i]);
-		if (list_empty(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[i])) {
-			read_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[i]);
-			continue;
-		}
-		list_for_each_entry(iter, &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[i],
-				    bb_avg_fragment_size_node) {
-			if (sbi->s_mb_stats)
-				atomic64_inc(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR1]);
-			if (likely(ext4_mb_good_group(ac, iter->bb_group, CR1))) {
-				grp = iter;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-		read_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[i]);
+		grp = ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists(ac, i);
 		if (grp)
 			break;
 	}
-- 
2.31.1