Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To:     tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Cc:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/19] ext4: treat stripe in block unit
Date:   Sat,  3 Jun 2023 23:03:12 +0800
Message-Id: <20230603150327.3596033-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230603150327.3596033-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20230603150327.3596033-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Stripe is misused in block unit and in cluster unit in different code
paths. User awared of stripe maybe not awared of bigalloc feature, so
treat stripe only in block unit to fix this.
Besides, it's hard to get stripe aligned blocks (start and length are both
aligned with stripe) if stripe is not aligned with cluster, just disable
stripe and alert user in this case to simpfy the code and avoid
unnecessary work to get stripe aligned blocks which likely to be failed.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 fs/ext4/super.c   | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index f6dc4f276ca4..7ef95bdde91d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2207,7 +2207,8 @@ int ext4_mb_find_by_goal(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 			     ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len, &ex);
 	ex.fe_logical = 0xDEADFA11; /* debug value */
 
-	if (max >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len && ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len == sbi->s_stripe) {
+	if (max >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len &&
+	    ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len == EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe)) {
 		ext4_fsblk_t start;
 
 		start = ext4_grp_offs_to_block(ac->ac_sb, &ex);
@@ -2372,7 +2373,7 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	struct ext4_free_extent ex;
 	ext4_fsblk_t first_group_block;
 	ext4_fsblk_t a;
-	ext4_grpblk_t i;
+	ext4_grpblk_t i, stripe;
 	int max;
 
 	BUG_ON(sbi->s_stripe == 0);
@@ -2384,10 +2385,12 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	do_div(a, sbi->s_stripe);
 	i = (a * sbi->s_stripe) - first_group_block;
 
+	stripe = EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe);
+	i = EXT4_B2C(sbi, i);
 	while (i < EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb)) {
 		if (!mb_test_bit(i, bitmap)) {
-			max = mb_find_extent(e4b, i, sbi->s_stripe, &ex);
-			if (max >= sbi->s_stripe) {
+			max = mb_find_extent(e4b, i, stripe, &ex);
+			if (max >= stripe) {
 				ac->ac_found++;
 				ex.fe_logical = 0xDEADF00D; /* debug value */
 				ac->ac_b_ex = ex;
@@ -2395,7 +2398,7 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 				break;
 			}
 		}
-		i += sbi->s_stripe;
+		i += stripe;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2758,7 +2761,8 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 			if (cr == 0)
 				ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
 			else if (cr == 1 && sbi->s_stripe &&
-					!(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % sbi->s_stripe))
+				 !(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len %
+				 EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe)))
 				ext4_mb_scan_aligned(ac, &e4b);
 			else
 				ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
@@ -3477,7 +3481,7 @@ int ext4_mb_init(struct super_block *sb)
 	 */
 	if (sbi->s_stripe > 1) {
 		sbi->s_mb_group_prealloc = roundup(
-			sbi->s_mb_group_prealloc, sbi->s_stripe);
+			sbi->s_mb_group_prealloc, EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe));
 	}
 
 	sbi->s_locality_groups = alloc_percpu(struct ext4_locality_group);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 56a5d1c469fc..e4441836239e 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5297,6 +5297,19 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 		goto failed_mount3;
 
 	sbi->s_stripe = ext4_get_stripe_size(sbi);
+	/*
+	 * It's hard to get stripe aligned blocks if stripe is not aligned with
+	 * cluster, just disable stripe and alert user to simpfy code and avoid
+	 * stripe aligned allocation which will rarely successes.
+	 */
+	if (sbi->s_stripe > 0 && sbi->s_cluster_ratio > 1 &&
+	    sbi->s_stripe % sbi->s_cluster_ratio != 0) {
+		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING,
+			 "stripe (%lu) is not aligned with cluster size (%u), "
+			 "stripe is disabled",
+			 sbi->s_stripe, sbi->s_cluster_ratio);
+		sbi->s_stripe = 0;
+	}
 	sbi->s_extent_max_zeroout_kb = 32;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.30.0