Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:56:29 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To:     Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
Cc:     viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, jack@suse.cz, jack@suse.com,
        tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, mark@fasheh.com,
        jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
        beanhuo@micron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] fs/ocfs2: No need to check return value of
 block_commit_write()
Message-ID: <20230619095629.qicy2guryvryc7el@quack3>
References: <20230618213250.694110-1-beanhuo@iokpp.de>
 <20230618213250.694110-5-beanhuo@iokpp.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230618213250.694110-5-beanhuo@iokpp.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:49, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> 
> Remove unnecessary check on the return value of block_commit_write().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/file.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index efb09de4343d..39d8dbb26bb3 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -808,12 +808,7 @@ static int ocfs2_write_zero_page(struct inode *inode, u64 abs_from,
>  
>  
>  		/* must not update i_size! */
> -		ret = block_commit_write(page, block_start + 1,
> -					 block_start + 1);
> -		if (ret < 0)
> -			mlog_errno(ret);
> -		else
> -			ret = 0;
> +		block_commit_write(page, block_start + 1, block_start + 1);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR