Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel_team@skhynix.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, duyuyang@gmail.com,
        johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
        willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
        minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
        sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com,
        penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
        ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com,
        melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com,
        42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, chris.p.wilson@intel.com,
        gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com, max.byungchul.park@gmail.com,
        boqun.feng@gmail.com, longman@redhat.com, hdanton@sina.com,
        her0gyugyu@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 rebased on v6.4 19/25] dept: Apply timeout consideration to swait
Date:   Mon,  3 Jul 2023 18:47:46 +0900
Message-Id: <20230703094752.79269-20-byungchul@sk.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230703094752.79269-1-byungchul@sk.com>
References: <20230703094752.79269-1-byungchul@sk.com>
Precedence: bulk

Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the
consideration to swait, assuming an input 'ret' in ___swait_event()
macro is used as a timeout value.

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
---
 include/linux/swait.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h
index 02848211cef5..def1e47bb678 100644
--- a/include/linux/swait.h
+++ b/include/linux/swait.h
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ extern void finish_swait(struct swait_queue_head *q, struct swait_queue *wait);
 	struct swait_queue __wait;					\
 	long __ret = ret;						\
 									\
-	sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL);					\
+	sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, __ret);			\
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&__wait.task_list);				\
 	for (;;) {							\
 		long __int = prepare_to_swait_event(&wq, &__wait, state);\
-- 
2.17.1