Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp155199rwb; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:40:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFXh0JP5Wxi5vlmQUqYsgcaiDsGJ8+FBEjtyFYxImGno68bXJWGJJHptbtB0B9RubYhUToP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b54:b0:686:22de:6365 with SMTP id p20-20020a056a000b5400b0068622de6365mr8111721pfo.8.1690479627660; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690479627; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SrZJPD74+76sz7uTfMzKGwbb1PnzJF1GU5KeJlWAfCOd0oxj22aIxBZQrJWkKLW/RM 5eXOSuACzibIj63qW+IW1tpXE2UTtKuIB0Yg6DWF4To7JmCCf/znoPJp1Tk7vNcc/cXL w3f9s9ecaEmjIpD5NvYitka4nz5hW9Dv4Qg4IyLUKCGQXeKmtJV1nHBOTolhbSEDDzre 7yhu7qlyWYu2glm7irOVCYube++5ZAsEZOTeTeF6LEUGrs6q4iP6doBwHnUsYnHCGYyL jg7C3pVzta6Oju313HMoHnFfd7zw8k1GNlT+/z0+kjC8Z4E5xl97FAAr/sGJcw8X3pzC a0Gw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=h24XB3gN4CMXKQZVs9DNTpwfQ1igPAwO6BWJJDtvchw=; fh=HFDFbc5lRXwuu0vgGURCiLYm5ywsvQKdSNBX4pGxTs4=; b=O21K+rMoA2sbIUytQ9fM7YS8/g6xHaH5+8eOpaM0YRTabfkSS38sPCK4gKMlbpfkoR /UHW3X7X0oiOjB204x2eQhcXHWziXeulcqiRUd8X8JE1txrGAOpV8I6OOhPgPrR5m1Bm UapF1jX2H8NlnWIyUHqnHyqZuFaBVvgGGHCrAQBVJNuEFsYWvTqhA/xIOb00JJHUX+Ql oaGL6qFi754sjhNyT5D3rHg6Pj11Ev6QuG7dKG907VuJQqLZPP3DvMcShRTOKi+nD4e4 3qelbi/JJkqWMqR3b6pC9Gz/FWDq3LGS9vKZWCjvqEv4QZ5msTiCAPIHv+F0fjvul9Wv Zcrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=05mI9uyN; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u10-20020a63234a000000b0054fbd904b6dsi1434922pgm.500.2023.07.27.10.40.12; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=05mI9uyN; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229626AbjG0R3C (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:29:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58558 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229959AbjG0R27 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:28:59 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36C8B2D68; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9CE21F889; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:28:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1690478932; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h24XB3gN4CMXKQZVs9DNTpwfQ1igPAwO6BWJJDtvchw=; b=05mI9uyNzMEvDvRgZTrtTP7cwzJ84gVvreQ5RCnOeSjmOkPksVokNuaCZze49lYLonkaqs 1DrOAAOHv04Hfpf84ZHm6gbepKfi5XxF3mnJhCxA9dyAMo1v/6UCbXSfCPptpxd7nc62Iq s5s5AzGi/Dl7c9K1AdY+qQMOrA2dMo4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1690478932; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h24XB3gN4CMXKQZVs9DNTpwfQ1igPAwO6BWJJDtvchw=; b=Rbsl0r8Vkabftpy9K6fGLPTVTgpHqHF+eOC8pLzhvKfUsbNa6AKh1VpyNtqRO2LCzrgmAr 2bfoCKV57kzKHdAg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B356213902; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 075pJlSpwmTKaAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:28:52 +0000 From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Subject: [PATCH v4 3/7] libfs: Validate negative dentries in case-insensitive directories Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:28:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20230727172843.20542-4-krisman@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230727172843.20542-1-krisman@suse.de> References: <20230727172843.20542-1-krisman@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Introduce a dentry revalidation helper to be used by case-insensitive filesystems to check if it is safe to reuse a negative dentry. A negative dentry is safe to be reused on a case-insensitive lookup if it was created during a case-insensitive lookup and this is not a lookup that will instantiate a dentry. If this is a creation lookup, we also need to make sure the name matches sensitively the name under lookup in order to assure the name preserving semantics. dentry->d_name is only checked by the case-insensitive d_revalidate hook in the LOOKUP_CREATE/LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET case since, for these cases, d_revalidate is always called with the parent inode read-locked, and therefore the name cannot change from under us. d_revalidate is only called in 4 places: lookup_dcache, __lookup_slow, lookup_open and lookup_fast: - lookup_dcache always calls it with zeroed flags, with the exception of when coming from __lookup_hash, which needs the parent locked already, for instance in the open/creation path, which is locked in open_last_lookups. - In __lookup_slow, either the parent inode is read locked by the caller (lookup_slow), or it is called with no flags (lookup_one*). The read lock suffices to prevent ->d_name modifications, with the exception of one case: __d_unalias, will call __d_move to fix a directory accessible from multiple dentries, which effectively swaps ->d_name while holding only the shared read lock. This happens through this flow: lookup_slow() //LOOKUP_CREATE d_lookup() ->d_lookup() d_splice_alias() __d_unalias() __d_move() Nevertheless, this case is not a problem because negative dentries are not allowed to be moved with __d_move. - lookup_open also requires the parent to be locked in the creation case, which is done in open_last_lookups. - lookup_fast will indeed be called with the parent unlocked, but it shouldn't be called with LOOKUP_CREATE. Either it is called in the link_path_walk, where nd->flags doesn't have LOOKUP_CREATE yet or in open_last_lookups. But, in this case, it also never has LOOKUP_CREATE, because it is only called on the !O_CREAT case, which means op->intent doesn't have LOOKUP_CREAT (set in build_open_flags only if O_CREAT is set). Finally, for the LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET, we are doing a rename, so the parents inodes are also locked. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi --- Changes since v3: - Add comment regarding creation (Eric) - Reorder checks to clarify !flags meaning (Eric) - Add commit message explanaton of the inode read lock wrt. __d_move. (Eric) Changes since v2: - Add comments to all rejection cases (Eric) - safeguard against filesystem creating dentries without LOOKUP flags --- fs/libfs.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c index 5b851315eeed..ed04c4dcc312 100644 --- a/fs/libfs.c +++ b/fs/libfs.c @@ -1462,9 +1462,64 @@ static int generic_ci_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *str) return 0; } +static inline int generic_ci_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, + const struct qstr *name, + unsigned int flags) +{ + if (d_is_negative(dentry)) { + const struct dentry *parent = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_parent); + const struct inode *dir = READ_ONCE(parent->d_inode); + + if (dir && needs_casefold(dir)) { + /* + * Negative dentries created prior to turning the + * directory case-insensitive cannot be trusted, since + * they don't ensure any possible case version of the + * filename doesn't exist. + */ + if (!d_is_casefold_lookup(dentry)) + return 0; + + /* + * Filesystems will call into d_revalidate without + * setting LOOKUP_ flags even for file creation (see + * lookup_one* variants). Reject negative dentries in + * this case, since we can't know for sure it won't be + * used for creation. + */ + if (!flags) + return 0; + + /* + * If the lookup is for creation, then a negative dentry + * can only be reused if it's a case-sensitive match, + * not just a case-insensitive one. This is needed to + * make the new file be created with the name the user + * specified, preserving case. + */ + if (flags & (LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET)) { + /* + * ->d_name won't change from under us in the + * creation path only, since d_revalidate during + * creation and renames is always called with + * the parent inode locked. It isn't the case + * for all lookup callpaths, so ->d_name must + * not be touched outside + * (LOOKUP_CREATE|LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET) context. + */ + if (dentry->d_name.len != name->len || + memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, name->name, name->len)) + return 0; + } + } + } + return 1; +} + static const struct dentry_operations generic_ci_dentry_ops = { .d_hash = generic_ci_d_hash, .d_compare = generic_ci_d_compare, + .d_revalidate_name = generic_ci_d_revalidate, }; #endif -- 2.41.0