Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 20:15:10 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] fs: stop using get_super in fs_mark_dead
Message-ID: <20230803-umringt-aufprallen-e3adc44d2c75@brauner>
References: <20230802154131.2221419-1-hch@lst.de>
 <20230802154131.2221419-8-hch@lst.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230802154131.2221419-8-hch@lst.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 05:41:26PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> fs_mark_dead currently uses get_super to find the superblock for the
> block device that is going away.  This means it is limited to the
> main device stored in sb->s_dev, leading to a lot of code duplication
> for file systems that can use multiple block devices.
> 
> Now that the holder for all block devices used by file systems is set
> to the super_block, we can instead look at that holder and then check
> if the file system is born and active, so do that instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>