Received: by 2002:a05:6358:51dd:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id 29csp101338rwl; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 11:33:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDlL6khMdi5bJyW2V3J7SqnKwV1oZ9bHlpa/QMw98IKpe7e19FLXUWuXEspR+DLmfFROiB X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:13c4:b0:140:3aa:e2ce with SMTP id ho4-20020a056a2013c400b0014003aae2cemr2953591pzc.42.1691605981661; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 11:33:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691605981; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=M0nxhJF/ni5quxeholxriQFQHcqoIv2ESu7tzyagCmhLHBtLeV9cAK1BpYJS0sSsob zhWwF2hziV34w+dzrMKYfe/ZuNagfe4TGKr7Mm79ueAk/3v0GkroGzh2N6xjX52GP4qE e529hww+aIFZYCvzYYER970M3f4llM9JcqZY7ChoxxT573x+ojjAjcFn3lmGxzSnJRdw DFObCrjkdN77aMlj2PCAmm9D0azC5SwYhClcRCkhzCZD4hHxGwXaSgNmiFshV0ylyeDt 4pLcXwzTx0Mu1hYYrvCNFpZ0eAxwcH00ZZ7vma7JacvYf2LYchZhIhxM6LvRS5ymNfHa kgVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=ZJYkWobh6KEl/9KBdVbAet9rd5oJbzUXYYantWtSSuI=; fh=D0mZnE3Vg2ym4uuJgPmxo0HvZC2Y+qumyr0BRf/YBDQ=; b=J1F+HkN2dSXqrRXQxu3L7lbG1oncY4K2PgwzFi+Gl8cgOHA1I7TbeEaaPh2Go04rmA /IjyYPxWq+/1lUXDKfBt6RcWMf9nZgTnsvxaxPZ1FB3bz9xXH0TfABuXvJMYFlIgr098 /0y8ynBbupVbUWdVYRkgHyjKgqZb1BNkTEc6uE2cl1eDZz/ZKFVaDxqUFbyOkaWWe0Sz eDfDmkxFB8xI01q2rVhZLgYVU7F83uxIZthkVB/d8VkDDayfRdAatV3lTY1zaD7oTufE 9GOTY6IBTMZpUxwYG/NvoBE/DP1TD3szND+Y6es7KhVnlfOgtsl823f8ZPQIioDJc1Ny Dypw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=meGLBjWx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k185-20020a6384c2000000b00565403c3ca8si1197552pgd.107.2023.08.09.11.32.21; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 11:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=meGLBjWx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230200AbjHIR7g (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:59:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35720 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229484AbjHIR7f (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:59:35 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD88171D; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E68B64364; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5192AC433C8; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:59:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1691603973; bh=xOe+Vz95v0qUUg0QOdDgphymvgENzflkYZLnMMULJfc=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=meGLBjWxluzaOBNuo8p0RmOQwgxUuFNZjvOIrqHLsT0YVm/rgDHwnHDJAx99/2L/o bhtobjoD8C6zGB5rdBPrQ785IrHaS3N4jJtTCfHc34NT0geG1/U9IaQFq3S4WuZ+t8 gzoPyUaQOM1ROi1uUYhm2o1c3laLFRiCZK/Lx2Wm4O80TbvA4CQm+kAJim7vyqiQ1H 44XIoEDh201mHVX5XJvZmC/E4Ogx1IKt/t/nyvPCcopm66rc52em9DBbgLmnfaxUsA shBRwdOI1wQgTtwpw38zZcoHm5c5hE7yNnsry2zyL7HvpHmwfSKALId/x1hyiXL2cb CwGZoXi1fmKhQ== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/13] fat: make fat_update_time get its own timestamp From: Jeff Layton To: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: Jan Kara , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Dominique Martinet , Christian Schoenebeck , David Howells , Marc Dionne , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Xiubo Li , Ilya Dryomov , Jan Harkes , coda@cs.cmu.edu, Tyler Hicks , Gao Xiang , Chao Yu , Yue Hu , Jeffle Xu , Namjae Jeon , Sungjong Seo , Jan Kara , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , Jaegeuk Kim , Miklos Szeredi , Bob Peterson , Andreas Gruenbacher , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tejun Heo , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Konstantin Komarov , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Mike Marshall , Martin Brandenburg , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , Sergey Senozhatsky , Richard Weinberger , Hans de Goede , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Amir Goldstein , "Darrick J. Wong" , Benjamin Coddington , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, codalist@telemann.coda.cs.cmu.edu, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 13:59:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87leek6rh1.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> References: <20230807-mgctime-v7-0-d1dec143a704@kernel.org> <20230807-mgctime-v7-5-d1dec143a704@kernel.org> <87msz08vc7.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <52bead1d6a33fec89944b96e2ec20d1ea8747a9a.camel@kernel.org> <878rak8hia.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <20230809150041.452w7gucjmvjnvbg@quack3> <87v8do6y8q.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <2cb998ff14ace352a9dd553e82cfa0aa92ec09ce.camel@kernel.org> <87leek6rh1.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 02:44 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Jeff Layton writes: >=20 > > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 00:17 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > > > Jan Kara writes: >=20 > [...] >=20 > > My mistake re: lazytime vs. relatime, but Jan is correct that this > > shouldn't break anything there. >=20 > Actually breaks ("break" means not corrupt fs, means it breaks lazytime > optimization). It is just not always, but it should be always for some > userspaces. >=20 > > The logic in the revised generic_update_time is different because FAT i= s > > is a bit strange. fat_update_time does extra truncation on the timestam= p > > that it is handed beyond what timestamp_truncate() does. > > fat_truncate_time is called in many different places too, so I don't > > feel comfortable making big changes to how that works. > >=20 > > In the case of generic_update_time, it calls inode_update_timestamps > > which returns a mask that shows which timestamps got updated. It then > > marks the dirty_flags appropriately for what was actually changed. > >=20 > > generic_update_time is used across many filesystems so we need to ensur= e > > that it's OK to use even when multigrain timestamps are enabled. Those > > haven't been enabled in FAT though, so I didn't bother, and left it to > > dirtying the inode in the same way it was before, even though it now > > fetches its own timestamps from the clock. Given the way that the mtime > > and ctime are smooshed together in FAT, that seemed reasonable. > >=20 > > Is there a particular case or flag combination you're concerned about > > here? >=20 > Yes. Because FAT has strange timestamps that different granularity on > disk . This is why generic time truncation doesn't work for FAT. >=20 > Well anyway, my concern is the only following part. In > generic_update_time(), S_[CM]TIME are not the cause of I_DIRTY_SYNC if > lazytime mode. >=20 > - if ((flags & S_VERSION) && inode_maybe_inc_iversion(inode, false)) > + if ((flags & (S_VERSION|S_CTIME|S_MTIME)) && inode_maybe_inc_iversion(i= node, false)) > dirty_flags |=3D I_DIRTY_SYNC; >=20 That would be wrong. The problem is that we're changing how update_time works: Previously, update_time was given a timestamp and a set of S_* flags to indicate which fields should be updated. Now, update_time is not given a timestamp. It needs to fetch it itself, but that subtly changes the meaning of the flags field. It now means "these fields needed to be updated when I last checked". The timestamp and i_version may now be different from when the flags field was set. This means that if any of S_CTIME/S_MTIME/S_VERSION were set that we need to attempt to update all 3 of them. They may now be different from the timestamp or version that we ultimately end up with. The above may look to you like it would always cause I_DIRTY_SYNC to be set on any ctime or mtime update, but inode_maybe_inc_iversion only returns true if it actually updated i_version, and it only does that if someone issued a ->getattr against the file since the last time it was updated. So, this shouldn't generate any more DIRTY_SYNC updates than it did before. --=20 Jeff Layton