Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
From:   bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 217965] ext4(?) regression since 6.5.0 on sata hdd
Date:   Tue, 03 Oct 2023 06:50:12 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-217965-13602-F4YcPSodG7@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-217965-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
References: <bug-217965-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217965

Ojaswin Mujoo (ojaswin.mujoo@ibm.com) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ojaswin.mujoo@ibm.com

--- Comment #5 from Ojaswin Mujoo (ojaswin.mujoo@ibm.com) ---
Hi Ivan,=20

Thanks for sharing the additional information. So I can see that you are
passing stripe=3D32752 and from the backtrace and I do see some of the func=
tions
in the trace that indicate that a striped allocation was taking place. There
were some changes in the allocator in 6.5 kernel if I'm not wrong but I'll =
need
to try to replicate this to confirm if the issue is related to those and up=
date
here.

Meanwhile, can you provide some more info on the following:

1. I want to check if this issue is related to the striped allocation code =
path
or if its also seen in the usual path. To check that, will it be possible f=
or
you to run the same workload without passing "stripe=3D32752" option during=
 mount
time?=20

2. How often do you see this issue, is it noticeable 100% of times?=20

Regards,
ojaswin

--=20
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.=