Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4+bounces-29-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 217965] ext4(?) regression since 6.5.0 on sata hdd
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:52:17 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-217965-13602-8f0RNAFQvY@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-217965-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
References: <bug-217965-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217965

--- Comment #37 from Eyal Lebedinsky (bugzilla@eyal.emu.id.au) ---
Finally got it.

kernel 6.5 was easy. kernel-6.4 debuginfo could not be found with 'dnf' and=
 I
searched long for it. Finally locating it on koji.

Then the third probe was wrong, and after some learning I discovered
    $ sudo perf probe --line "ext4_mb_scan_aligned"
     21         while (i < EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb)) {
     22                 if (!mb_test_bit(i, bitmap)) {
     23                         max =3D mb_find_extent(e4b, i, sbi->s_strip=
e,
&ex);
     24                         if (max >=3D sbi->s_stripe) {
     25                                 ac->ac_found++;
     26                                 ex.fe_logical =3D 0xDEADF00D; /* de=
bug
value */
                                        ac->ac_b_ex =3D ex;
     28                                 ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b);
     29                                 break;
                                }
                        }
     32                 i +=3D sbi->s_stripe;
                }

and decided to pick line 24 (not the original 26). Is this right?

I will now upload the reports.

--=20
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.=