Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4+bounces-704-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 217965] ext4(?) regression since 6.5.0 on sata hdd
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 22:20:41 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-217965-13602-w3R39jsVJs@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-217965-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
References: <bug-217965-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217965

--- Comment #62 from Matthew Stapleton (matthew4196@gmail.com) ---
With top at 1 second intervals , with thunderbird source extract, I can see=
 the
flush process with around 70% to 100% for 2 1 second intervals during the t=
ar
extract.  I don't this this much cpu usage was present with CR_BEST_AVAIL_L=
EN
commented out.  Hopefully the perf probes will show where the real usage is=
.  I
still haven't tried out the perf probes, but I'm still planning on doing th=
at
hopefully sometime in the next few days.

--=20
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.=