Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4+bounces-789-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:39:58 +0800
From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] xfstests: test custom crypto data unit size
Message-ID: <20240112133958.pgxs3gl33g5hf7pn@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>
References: <20231121223909.4617-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
 <20240111035444.GA3453@sol.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240111035444.GA3453@sol.localdomain>

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 07:54:44PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:39:05PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > This series adds a test that verifies the on-disk format of encrypted
> > files that use a crypto data unit size that differs from the filesystem
> > block size.  This tests the functionality that was introduced in Linux
> > 6.7 by kernel commit 5b1188847180 ("fscrypt: support crypto data unit
> > size less than filesystem block size").
> 
> Hi Zorro, can you consider applying this series?  It's been out for review for
> 3 months, so I don't think reviews are going to come in.  The prerequisite
> xfsprogs patch is already present on the for-next branch of xfsprogs.

Sure Eric, I thought about this patchset last week, I saw that xfsprogs
patchset has been merge. I'll give this patchset a basic test, to make
sure it won't break xfstests, then merge it.

Thanks, and sorry this late.
Zorro

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> - Eric
>