Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4+bounces-1227-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:38:07 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
	yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ext4: set the type of max_zeroout to unsigned int to
 avoid overflow
Message-ID: <20240213163807.lodqvvw24namiu7g@quack3>
References: <20240126085716.1363019-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
 <20240126085716.1363019-8-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240126085716.1363019-8-libaokun1@huawei.com>

On Fri 26-01-24 16:57:16, Baokun Li wrote:
> The max_zeroout is of type int and the s_extent_max_zeroout_kb is of
> type uint, and the s_extent_max_zeroout_kb can be freely modified via
> the sysfs interface. When the block size is 1024, max_zeroout may
> overflow, so declare it as unsigned int to avoid overflow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 01299b55a567..8653b13e8248 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -3425,10 +3425,8 @@ static int ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized(handle_t *handle,
>  	struct ext4_extent zero_ex1, zero_ex2;
>  	struct ext4_extent *ex, *abut_ex;
>  	ext4_lblk_t ee_block, eof_block;
> -	unsigned int ee_len, depth, map_len = map->m_len;
> -	int allocated = 0, max_zeroout = 0;
> -	int err = 0;
> -	int split_flag = EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2;
> +	unsigned int ee_len, depth, map_len = map->m_len, max_zeroout = 0;
> +	int err = 0, allocated = 0, split_flag = EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2;

Honestly, I prefer if we keep unrelated variables on different lines,
especially when they have initializers. I find the code more readable that
way. So in this case:

	int err = 0;
	int split_flag = EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2;
	int allocated = 0;
	unsigned int max_zeroout = 0;

But otherwise the fix looks good!

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR