Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4+bounces-1947-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	jack@suse.cz,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	hch@infradead.org,
	djwong@kernel.org,
	willy@infradead.org,
	zokeefe@google.com,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com,
	chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
	yukuai3@huawei.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/34] ext4: check the extent status again before inserting delalloc block
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:27:46 +0800
Message-Id: <20240410132818.2812377-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240410132818.2812377-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20240410132818.2812377-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

Now we lookup extent status entry without holding the i_data_sem before
inserting delalloc block, it works fine in buffered write path and
because it holds i_rwsem and folio lock, and the mmap path holds folio
lock, so the found extent locklessly couldn't be modified concurrently.
But it could be raced by fallocate since it allocate block whitout
holding i_rwsem and folio lock.

ext4_page_mkwrite()             ext4_fallocate()
 block_page_mkwrite()
  ext4_da_map_blocks()
   //find hole in extent status tree
                                 ext4_alloc_file_blocks()
                                  ext4_map_blocks()
                                   //allocate block and unwritten extent
   ext4_insert_delayed_block()
    ext4_da_reserve_space()
     //reserve one more block
    ext4_es_insert_delayed_block()
     //drop unwritten extent and add delayed extent by mistake

Then, the delalloc extent is wrong until writeback, the one more
reserved block can't be release any more and trigger below warning:

 EXT4-fs (pmem2): Inode 13 (00000000bbbd4d23): i_reserved_data_blocks(1) not cleared!

Hold i_data_sem in write mode directly can fix the problem, but it's
expansive, we should keep the lockless check and check the extent again
once we need to add an new delalloc block.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 6a41172c06e1..118b0497a954 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1737,6 +1737,7 @@ static int ext4_da_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
 		if (ext4_es_is_hole(&es))
 			goto add_delayed;
 
+found:
 		/*
 		 * Delayed extent could be allocated by fallocate.
 		 * So we need to check it.
@@ -1781,6 +1782,24 @@ static int ext4_da_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
 
 add_delayed:
 	down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
+	/*
+	 * Lookup extents tree again under i_data_sem, make sure this
+	 * inserting delalloc range haven't been delayed or allocated
+	 * whitout holding i_rwsem and folio lock.
+	 */
+	if (ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, iblock, NULL, &es)) {
+		if (!ext4_es_is_hole(&es)) {
+			up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
+			goto found;
+		}
+	} else if (!ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) {
+		retval = ext4_map_query_blocks(NULL, inode, map);
+		if (retval) {
+			up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
+			return retval;
+		}
+	}
+
 	retval = ext4_insert_delayed_block(inode, map->m_lblk);
 	up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
 	if (retval)
-- 
2.39.2