2008-05-10 00:34:09

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: - jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch removed from -mm tree


The patch titled
jbd: tidy up revoke cache initialisation and destruction
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch

This patch was dropped because it had testing failures

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: jbd: tidy up revoke cache initialisation and destruction
From: "Duane Griffin" <[email protected]>

Make revoke cache destruction safe to call if initialisation fails partially
or entirely. This allows it to be used to cleanup in the case of
initialisation failure, simplifying that code slightly.

Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

fs/jbd/revoke.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction fs/jbd/revoke.c
--- a/fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction
+++ a/fs/jbd/revoke.c
@@ -166,33 +166,41 @@ static struct jbd_revoke_record_s *find_
return NULL;
}

+void journal_destroy_revoke_caches(void)
+{
+ if (revoke_record_cache) {
+ kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
+ revoke_record_cache = NULL;
+ }
+ if (revoke_table_cache) {
+ kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_table_cache);
+ revoke_table_cache = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
int __init journal_init_revoke_caches(void)
{
+ J_ASSERT(!revoke_record_cache);
+ J_ASSERT(!revoke_table_cache);
+
revoke_record_cache = kmem_cache_create("revoke_record",
sizeof(struct jbd_revoke_record_s),
0,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_TEMPORARY,
NULL);
if (!revoke_record_cache)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto record_cache_failure;

revoke_table_cache = kmem_cache_create("revoke_table",
sizeof(struct jbd_revoke_table_s),
0, SLAB_TEMPORARY, NULL);
- if (!revoke_table_cache) {
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
- revoke_record_cache = NULL;
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- return 0;
-}
+ if (!revoke_table_cache)
+ goto table_cache_failure;

-void journal_destroy_revoke_caches(void)
-{
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
- revoke_record_cache = NULL;
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_table_cache);
- revoke_table_cache = NULL;
+table_cache_failure:
+ journal_destroy_revoke_caches();
+record_cache_failure:
+ return -ENOMEM;
}

static struct jbd_revoke_table_s *journal_init_revoke_table(int hash_size)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are

jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch
jbd-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch