The patch titled
fs: introduce bgl_lock_ptr()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: fs: introduce bgl_lock_ptr()
From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
As suggested by Andreas Dilger, introduce a bgl_lock_ptr() helper in
<linux/blockgroup_lock.h> and add separate sb_bgl_lock() helpers to filesystem
specific header files to break the hidden dependency to struct
ext[234]_sb_info. Also, while at it, convert the macros to static inlines to
try make up for all the times I broke Andrew Morton's tree.
Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---
fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/blockgroup_lock.h | 7 +++++--
include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr
+++ a/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h
@@ -146,4 +146,10 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
struct flex_groups *s_flex_groups;
};
+static inline spinlock_t *
+sb_bgl_lock(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int block_group)
+{
+ return bgl_lock_ptr(&sbi->s_blockgroup_lock, block_group);
+}
+
#endif /* _EXT4_SB */
diff -puN include/linux/blockgroup_lock.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr include/linux/blockgroup_lock.h
--- a/include/linux/blockgroup_lock.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr
+++ a/include/linux/blockgroup_lock.h
@@ -53,7 +53,10 @@ static inline void bgl_lock_init(struct
* The accessor is a macro so we can embed a blockgroup_lock into different
* superblock types
*/
-#define sb_bgl_lock(sb, block_group) \
- (&(sb)->s_blockgroup_lock.locks[(block_group) & (NR_BG_LOCKS-1)].lock)
+static inline spinlock_t *
+bgl_lock_ptr(struct blockgroup_lock *bgl, unsigned int block_group)
+{
+ return &bgl->locks[(block_group) & (NR_BG_LOCKS-1)].lock;
+}
#endif
diff -puN include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h
--- a/include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr
+++ a/include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h
@@ -108,4 +108,10 @@ struct ext2_sb_info {
struct ext2_reserve_window_node s_rsv_window_head;
};
+static inline spinlock_t *
+sb_bgl_lock(struct ext2_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int block_group)
+{
+ return bgl_lock_ptr(&sbi->s_blockgroup_lock, block_group);
+}
+
#endif /* _LINUX_EXT2_FS_SB */
diff -puN include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h
--- a/include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h~fs-introduce-bgl_lock_ptr
+++ a/include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h
@@ -83,4 +83,10 @@ struct ext3_sb_info {
#endif
};
+static inline spinlock_t *
+sb_bgl_lock(struct ext3_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int block_group)
+{
+ return bgl_lock_ptr(&sbi->s_blockgroup_lock, block_group);
+}
+
#endif /* _LINUX_EXT3_FS_SB */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are
origin.patch
repeatable-slab-corruption-with-ltp-msgctl08.patch
linux-next.patch
ext4-allocate-s_blockgroup_lock-separately.patch
mm-make-get_user_pages-interruptible.patch
mm-make-get_user_pages-interruptible-mmotm-ignore-sigkill-in-get_user_pages-during-munlock.patch
ext2-allocate-s_blockgroup_lock-separately.patch
ext3-allocate-s_blockgroup_lock-separately.patch
memcg-add-inactive_anon_is_low.patch
dma_alloc_coherent-clean-it-up.patch
dma-coherent-catch-oversized-requests-to-dma_alloc_from_coherent.patch
nilfs2-avoid-double-error-caused-by-nilfs_transaction_end.patch
kmemleak-add-the-base-support.patch
kmemleak-add-the-base-support-fix.patch
kmemleak-add-the-slab-memory-allocation-freeing-hooks.patch
kmemleak-add-the-slob-memory-allocation-freeing-hooks.patch
kmemleak-add-the-slub-memory-allocation-freeing-hooks.patch
kmemleak-remove-some-of-the-kmemleak-false-positives.patch
slab-leaks3-default-y.patch