2.6.29-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 33b9817e2ae097c7b8d256e3510ac6c54fc6d9d0)
Use a very large unsigned number (~0xffff) as as the fake block number
for the delayed new buffer. The VFS should never try to write out this
number, but if it does, this will make it obvious.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2220,6 +2220,10 @@ static int ext4_da_get_block_prep(struct
struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create)
{
int ret = 0;
+ sector_t invalid_block = ~((sector_t) 0xffff);
+
+ if (invalid_block < ext4_blocks_count(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es))
+ invalid_block = ~0;
BUG_ON(create == 0);
BUG_ON(bh_result->b_size != inode->i_sb->s_blocksize);
@@ -2241,7 +2245,7 @@ static int ext4_da_get_block_prep(struct
/* not enough space to reserve */
return ret;
- map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, 0);
+ map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, invalid_block);
set_buffer_new(bh_result);
set_buffer_delay(bh_result);
} else if (ret > 0) {