2009-09-02 03:18:30

by Akira Fujita

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/4]ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()

ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()

From: Akira Fujita <[email protected]>

mext_check_arguments() in move_extents.c has wrong comparisons.
orig_start which is passed from user-space is block unit,
but i_size of inode is byte unit, therefore the checks do not work fine.
This mis-check leads to the overflow of 'len' and then hits BUG_ON()
in ext4_move_extens(). The patch fixes this issue.

Signed-off-by: Akira Fujita <[email protected]>
---
fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
index 5821e0b..60ed567 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -972,43 +972,52 @@ mext_check_arguments(struct inode *orig_inode,
}

if (orig_inode->i_size > donor_inode->i_size) {
- if (orig_start >= donor_inode->i_size) {
+ if (orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits >=
+ donor_inode->i_size) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: orig start offset "
"[%llu] should be less than donor file size "
"[%lld] [ino:orig %lu, donor_inode %lu]\n",
- orig_start, donor_inode->i_size,
- orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
+ orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits,
+ donor_inode->i_size, orig_inode->i_ino,
+ donor_inode->i_ino);
return -EINVAL;
}
-
- if (orig_start + *len > donor_inode->i_size) {
+ if ((orig_start + *len) << orig_inode->i_blkbits >
+ donor_inode->i_size) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: End offset [%llu] should "
"be less than donor file size [%lld]."
"So adjust length from %llu to %lld "
"[ino:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
- orig_start + *len, donor_inode->i_size,
- *len, donor_inode->i_size - orig_start,
+ (orig_start + *len) << orig_inode->i_blkbits,
+ donor_inode->i_size,
+ *len, (donor_inode->i_size >>
+ orig_inode->i_blkbits) - orig_start,
orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
- *len = donor_inode->i_size - orig_start;
+ *len = (donor_inode->i_size >> orig_inode->i_blkbits) -
+ orig_start;
}
} else {
- if (orig_start >= orig_inode->i_size) {
+ if (orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits >=
+ orig_inode->i_size) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: start offset [%llu] "
"should be less than original file size "
"[%lld] [inode:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
- orig_start, orig_inode->i_size,
- orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
+ orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits,
+ orig_inode->i_size, orig_inode->i_ino,
+ donor_inode->i_ino);
return -EINVAL;
}


2009-09-02 16:02:53

by Peng Tao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4]ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()

Hi, Akira,

Akira Fujita wrote:
> ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()
>
> From: Akira Fujita <[email protected]>
>
> mext_check_arguments() in move_extents.c has wrong comparisons.
> orig_start which is passed from user-space is block unit,
> but i_size of inode is byte unit, therefore the checks do not work fine.
> This mis-check leads to the overflow of 'len' and then hits BUG_ON()
> in ext4_move_extens(). The patch fixes this issue.
While the bug is true, I wander if it checks all conditions, because i_size isn't
blocksize aligned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akira Fujita <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> index 5821e0b..60ed567 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> @@ -972,43 +972,52 @@ mext_check_arguments(struct inode *orig_inode,
> }
>
> if (orig_inode->i_size > donor_inode->i_size) {
> - if (orig_start >= donor_inode->i_size) {
> + if (orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits >=
> + donor_inode->i_size) {
> ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: orig start offset "
> "[%llu] should be less than donor file size "
> "[%lld] [ino:orig %lu, donor_inode %lu]\n",
> - orig_start, donor_inode->i_size,
> - orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
> + orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits,
> + donor_inode->i_size, orig_inode->i_ino,
> + donor_inode->i_ino);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - if (orig_start + *len > donor_inode->i_size) {
> + if ((orig_start + *len) << orig_inode->i_blkbits >
> + donor_inode->i_size) {
> ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: End offset [%llu] should "
> "be less than donor file size [%lld]."
> "So adjust length from %llu to %lld "
> "[ino:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
> - orig_start + *len, donor_inode->i_size,
> - *len, donor_inode->i_size - orig_start,
> + (orig_start + *len) << orig_inode->i_blkbits,
> + donor_inode->i_size,
> + *len, (donor_inode->i_size >>
> + orig_inode->i_blkbits) - orig_start,
> orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
> - *len = donor_inode->i_size - orig_start;
> + *len = (donor_inode->i_size >> orig_inode->i_blkbits) -
> + orig_start;
> }
> } else {
> - if (orig_start >= orig_inode->i_size) {
> + if (orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits >=
> + orig_inode->i_size) {
> ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: start offset [%llu] "
> "should be less than original file size "
> "[%lld] [inode:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
> - orig_start, orig_inode->i_size,
> - orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
> + orig_start << orig_inode->i_blkbits,
> + orig_inode->i_size, orig_inode->i_ino,
> + donor_inode->i_ino);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - if (orig_start + *len > orig_inode->i_size) {
> + if ((orig_start + *len) << orig_inode->i_blkbits >
> + orig_inode->i_size) {
> ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: Adjust length "
> "from %llu to %lld. Because it should be "
> "less than original file size "
> "[ino:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
> - *len, orig_inode->i_size - orig_start,
> + *len, (orig_inode->i_size >>
> + orig_inode->i_blkbits) - orig_start,
> orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
> - *len = orig_inode->i_size - orig_start;
> + *len = (orig_inode->i_size >> orig_inode->i_blkbits) -
> + orig_start;
> }
> }
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


--
Best Regards,
Peng Tao
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology
Beijing Univ. of Posts and Telecoms.

2009-09-06 02:10:33

by Theodore Ts'o

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4]ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:17:50PM +0900, Akira Fujita wrote:
> ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()
>
> From: Akira Fujita <[email protected]>
>
> mext_check_arguments() in move_extents.c has wrong comparisons.
> orig_start which is passed from user-space is block unit,
> but i_size of inode is byte unit, therefore the checks do not work fine.
> This mis-check leads to the overflow of 'len' and then hits BUG_ON()
> in ext4_move_extens(). The patch fixes this issue.

Thanks, I've added this to the ext4 patch queue to be pushed when the
2.6.32 merge window opens.

- Ted

2009-09-16 04:56:21

by Akira Fujita

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4]ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()

Hi Ted,

We found that "fix-wrong-comparisons-in-mext_check_arguments"
in the ext4 patch queue does not fix the objective issue completely.
(The last partial block is not checked in mext_check_arguments().)

Could you replace "fix-wrong-comparisons-in-mext_check_arguments"
in the ext4 patch queue with this patch ?

Regards,
Akira Fujita

Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:17:50PM +0900, Akira Fujita wrote:
>> ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()
>>
>> From: Akira Fujita <[email protected]>
>>
>> mext_check_arguments() in move_extents.c has wrong comparisons.
>> orig_start which is passed from user-space is block unit,
>> but i_size of inode is byte unit, therefore the checks do not work fine.
>> This mis-check leads to the overflow of 'len' and then hits BUG_ON()
>> in ext4_move_extens(). The patch fixes this issue.
>
> Thanks, I've added this to the ext4 patch queue to be pushed when the
> 2.6.32 merge window opens.
>
> - Ted

Signed-off-by: Akira Fujita <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Greg Freemyer <[email protected]>
---
move_extent.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
index 429fb6f..0670464 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -898,6 +898,10 @@ mext_check_arguments(struct inode *orig_inode,
struct inode *donor_inode, __u64 orig_start,
__u64 donor_start, __u64 *len, __u64 moved_len)
{
+ ext4_lblk_t orig_blocks, donor_blocks;
+ unsigned int blkbits = orig_inode->i_blkbits;
+ unsigned int blocksize = 1 << blkbits;
+
/* Regular file check */
if (!S_ISREG(orig_inode->i_mode) || !S_ISREG(donor_inode->i_mode)) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: The argument files should be "
@@ -972,43 +976,47 @@ mext_check_arguments(struct inode *orig_inode,
}

if (orig_inode->i_size > donor_inode->i_size) {
- if (orig_start >= donor_inode->i_size) {
+ donor_blocks = (donor_inode->i_size + blocksize - 1) >> blkbits;
+ /* TODO: eliminate this artificial restriction */
+ if (orig_start >= donor_blocks) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: orig start offset "
- "[%llu] should be less than donor file size "
- "[%lld] [ino:orig %lu, donor_inode %lu]\n",
- orig_start, donor_inode->i_size,
+ "[%llu] should be less than donor file blocks "
+ "[%u] [ino:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
+ orig_start, donor_blocks,
orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
return -EINVAL;
}

- if (orig_start + *len > donor_inode->i_size) {
+ /* TODO: eliminate this artificial restriction */
+ if (orig_start + *len > donor_blocks) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: End offset [%llu] should "
- "be less than donor file size [%lld]."
- "So adjust length from %llu to %lld "
+ "be less than donor file blocks [%u]."
+ "So adjust length from %llu to %llu "
"[ino:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
- orig_start + *len, donor_inode->i_size,
- *len, donor_inode->i_size - orig_start,
+ orig_start + *len, donor_blocks,
+ *len, donor_blocks - orig_start,
orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
- *len = donor_inode->i_size - orig_start;
+ *len = donor_blocks - orig_start;
}
} else {
- if (orig_start >= orig_inode->i_size) {
+ orig_blocks = (orig_inode->i_size + blocksize - 1) >> blkbits;
+ if (orig_start >= orig_blocks) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: start offset [%llu] "
- "should be less than original file size "
- "[%lld] [inode:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
- orig_start, orig_inode->i_size,
+ "should be less than original file blocks "
+ "[%u] [ino:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
+ orig_start, orig_blocks,
orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
return -EINVAL;
}

- if (orig_start + *len > orig_inode->i_size) {
+ if (orig_start + *len > orig_blocks) {
ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: Adjust length "
- "from %llu to %lld. Because it should be "
- "less than original file size "
+ "from %llu to %llu. Because it should be "
+ "less than original file blocks "
"[ino:orig %lu, donor %lu]\n",
- *len, orig_inode->i_size - orig_start,
+ *len, orig_blocks - orig_start,
orig_inode->i_ino, donor_inode->i_ino);
- *len = orig_inode->i_size - orig_start;
+ *len = orig_blocks - orig_start;
}
}

2009-09-16 18:37:37

by Theodore Ts'o

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4]ext4: Fix wrong comparisons in mext_check_arguments()

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:56:04PM +0900, Akira Fujita wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> We found that "fix-wrong-comparisons-in-mext_check_arguments"
> in the ext4 patch queue does not fix the objective issue completely.
> (The last partial block is not checked in mext_check_arguments().)
>
> Could you replace "fix-wrong-comparisons-in-mext_check_arguments"
> in the ext4 patch queue with this patch ?

Done, thanks.

- Ted