On Sunday January 25, [email protected] wrote:
> The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers
> running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or
> what? Thanks
> RPC request reserved 0 but used 124
>
> Debian sarge
> nfs-kernel-server
> am-untils
> nfsv3 over tcp
>
stale file handles is a known bug that is fixed in the but BK and will
be in 2.6.3.
The "RPC request reserved 0 ..." is very odd. It does immediately
indicate a major problem, but it should be fixed, if only I could
figure out what was causing it.
I might put come more info into the message so future bug reports will
tell me more.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:46:31AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday January 25, [email protected] wrote:
> > The below is being reported, on and off, when hitting nfs-kernel-servers
> > running on 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 Could someone tell me if this is smoe bug or
> > what? Thanks
> > RPC request reserved 0 but used 124
> >
> > Debian sarge
> > nfs-kernel-server
> > am-untils
> > nfsv3 over tcp
> >
>
> stale file handles is a known bug that is fixed in the but BK and will
> be in 2.6.3.
do you mean 2.6.2?
I've merged the nfsd stale file handles into 2.6.1-bk2 and it is working
fine on a nfs server here...