From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thomas_Lang=E5s?= Subject: Re: NFS Performance issues... Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:34:51 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020316163451.A9226@stud.ntnu.no> References: <038201c1cc7b$5c8be400$2651a641@laptop> Reply-To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from flaske.stud.ntnu.no ([129.241.56.72]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 16mGCt-0001zC-00 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 07:34:55 -0800 To: Matt Heaton In-Reply-To: <038201c1cc7b$5c8be400$2651a641@laptop>; from admin@0catch.com on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:44:27PM -0700 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Matt Heaton: > I run a fairly large free/paid hosting service. We have about 8 webservers (NFS Clients) that hook up to a single NFS server box. We > are having SEVERE performance issues. The clients are READ ONLY clients. We have set the rsize to 8192 bytes, but otherwise > are using the standard setup. The NFS server seems to be able to only serve about 11 Mbits of data before it dies? Is this typical > performace? We are mostly serving web pages so most files are small although some are bigger (3-5 megabytes). Both the clients > are the server are redhat 7.2 (NFS 3) You fail to mention what kernel version you're running? -- Thomas _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs