From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thomas_Lang=E5s?= Subject: Re: NFS Performance issues... Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:35:54 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020316183554.C9530@stud.ntnu.no> References: <038201c1cc7b$5c8be400$2651a641@laptop> <20020316163451.A9226@stud.ntnu.no> <040601c1cd0b$4f707930$2651a641@laptop> Reply-To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from brev.stud.ntnu.no ([129.241.56.70]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 16mI63-0004wQ-00 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:35:59 -0800 To: Matt Heaton In-Reply-To: <040601c1cd0b$4f707930$2651a641@laptop>; from admin@0catch.com on Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 09:54:53AM -0700 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Matt Heaton: > Sorry, we have a 100 Mbit Network. A cisco 2924 switch where everything is > plugged into. An ALTEON Load balancer/firewall. We are running 2.4.7-10 > (Redhat 7.2). I believe it might be something with the kernel as something > the > memory just spirals down. Doesn't 7.2 have some virtual memory problem like > that? First off all, try updating to the errata kernel, 2.4.9 (it's in the updates-directory on evey redhat-mirror). -- Thomas _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs