From: Spencer Shepler <shepler@eng.sun.com>
Subject: Re: follow up to: Exporting to Solaris with 2.4.18
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 00:17:21 -0600
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20020328061721.GA104213@sheplerathome.eng.sun.com>
References: <1017198311.17344.43.camel@lws020.get2chip.com>
Reply-To: shepler@eng.sun.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Received: from mercury.sun.com ([192.9.25.1])
	by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
	id 16qTE6-0006xL-00
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:17:34 -0800
To: Chris Croswhite <ccroswhite@get2chip.com>
In-Reply-To: <1017198311.17344.43.camel@lws020.get2chip.com>
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=nfs>


Chris,

It is possible that the Solaris client is getting confused if the
mount daemon on the server is advertising version 3 of the MOUNT
protocol while the NFS version is only version 2.  The "soft" option
may also be playing a part in this.

A network trace of the interaction would help explain a lot; if one is
available.

Spencer

On Tue, Chris Croswhite wrote:
> So I have come to this during my investigation of why my suns can not
> see into a mounted nfs drive:
> 
> Mar 26 19:00:07 scs006.get2chip.com automountd[157]: [ID 748625 daemon.error] us002 server not responding: RPC: Program/version mismatch
> 
> Not exactly sure what to make of this other than it wants to use nfs v3 and the server is only dishing nfs v2?
> 
> TIA,
> Chris
> 
> 
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> 
> Additionally, I have no problems with all the Linux boxes (both RH6.2,
> and RH7.x).  Also, I can see that the mounted point on the Slowlaris box
> shows the permissions and group owenership of the remote drive.  The
> server logs show:
> 
> 
> Mar 24 05:10:01 us002 rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from
> 192.168.1.76:625 for /home/customers (/home)
> 
> 
> Am I am not sure what is happening. Any help is greatly appreciated.
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Chris
> 
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> 
> Having difficulties getting Slowlaris boxes to work with my linux file
> server.  When I 'ls' the mount point I get nothing.  If I use the NIS
> tables and I try to cd into the dir (even as the owner of the dir), I
> get permission denied.  
> 
> I manually mounted the drive like this:
> 
> mount -F nfs -o soft us002:/home/customers /customers
> 
> ls of the this mount point shows nothing.
> 
> The linux box is a stock RH7.2 upgraded to 2.4.18 kernel. I am running
> with "--no-nfs-version 3" option. The export table is simple:
> /home/customers	*(rw)
> 
> 
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> TIA,
> Chris Croswhite
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

-- 
Spencer


_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs