From: Gavin Woodhatch <gavin.woodhatch@netzone.ch>
Subject: Re[2]: NFS Performance
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:11:37 +0200
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <157854731108.20020418221137@netzone.ch>
References: <21851575821.20020418211902@netzone.ch>
 <20020418155633.F8095@redhat.com>
Reply-To: Gavin Woodhatch <gavin.woodhatch@netzone.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from mail1.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.31])
	by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
	id 16yIFx-0002z4-00
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:11:50 -0700
To: Matthew Galgoci <mgalgoci@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020418155633.F8095@redhat.com>
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=nfs>

Hi Matthew

As i wrote, i have tried with the TCP Option. It did not make a big
differance.

>
> Varied with differnt wsize and rsize (from 4096 to 32768, and also not
> specified) , also tried with the option tcp.

Auspex makes high performance NAS Servers (www.auspex.com). And it
does Support NFSv3 and TCP.


Thanks very mutch for your help.

Gavin Woodhatch

NetZone Ltd.


_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs