From: "Pedro M. Rodrigues" <pmanuel@myrealbox.com>
Subject: RE: nfs performance: read only/gigE/nolock/1Tb per day
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:06:04 +0200
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <3CC46D2C.16152.967267@localhost>
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20020422090930.02829b60@pop.sfrn.dnai.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143])
	by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ziCw-000415-00
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:06:34 -0700
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20020422090930.02829b60@pop.sfrn.dnai.com>
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=nfs>


   Indeed. The NFS client part of RH kernels is really lacking. They 
work pretty well at NFS serving though, enough for me to have them in 
several servers without complains. 


/Pedro

On 22 Apr 2002 at 9:23, Andrew Ryan wrote:

> technical support and expect to ever get it. But since RH seems to
> give very little attention to a stable, reliable NFS client
> implementation in their kernels, if you're stuck using NFS on linux,
> it may be your only choice.
> 
> 
> andrew
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs