From: Ion Badulescu Subject: Re: 3 bugs with UDP mounts Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:20:02 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200204231520.g3NFK2A04858@buggy.badula.org> References: <5.0.2.1.0.20020422235308.02a960b0@pop.sfrn.dnai.com> Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, "Lever, Charles" Return-path: Received: from bgp401130bgs.jersyc01.nj.comcast.net ([68.36.96.125] helo=buggy.badula.org) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17025W-0002ca-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:20:14 -0700 To: Andrew Ryan In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20020422235308.02a960b0@pop.sfrn.dnai.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:37:15 -0700, Andrew Ryan wrote: > Would it be possible -- via a kernel option or mount option -- to control > the behavior in the Linux client as well so that high performance can be > achieved on a Linux NFS client with high block sizes and UDP? Mixed > 100/1000 networks are becoming more of a reality and NFS/TCP, while having > gotten tremendously better in the last year or so, is still a work in > progress, and it's nice to have another acceptable option for mounting. > > Solaris has clearly solved this problem somehow -- it would be nice if > linux could as well. Are you absolutely sure that Solaris is mounting NFS/UDP? The reason I'm asking is because Solaris' mount_nfs defaults to using TCP unless you explicitly force it to use UDP with -o proto=udp. Just checking... Thanks, Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs