From: Andrew Ryan Subject: Re: 3 bugs with UDP mounts Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:28:31 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.0.20020423092524.024733a0@pop.sfrn.dnai.com> References: <5.0.2.1.0.20020422235308.02a960b0@pop.sfrn.dnai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from smithers.sfrn.dnai.com ([208.59.199.26]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17039L-0006Va-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:28:15 -0700 To: Ion Badulescu In-Reply-To: <200204231520.g3NFK2A04858@buggy.badula.org> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: At 11:20 AM 4/23/02 -0400, Ion Badulescu wrote: >On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:37:15 -0700, Andrew Ryan wrote: > > Solaris has clearly solved this problem somehow -- it would be nice if > > linux could as well. > >Are you absolutely sure that Solaris is mounting NFS/UDP? The reason I'm >asking is because Solaris' mount_nfs defaults to using TCP unless you >explicitly force it to use UDP with -o proto=udp. Yes, indeed, I did mount the server with the 'proto=udp' option on the Solaris host. thanks, andrew _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs