From: miah Subject: Re: 3 bugs with UDP mounts Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:29:22 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020423092922.A9261@server.sunrise-linux.com> References: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E50CEBE@black.eng.netapp.co m> <5.0.2.1.0.20020422235308.02a960b0@pop.sfrn.dnai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [198.78.66.27] (helo=server.sunrise-linux.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1703AY-0006wU-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:29:31 -0700 Received: (from miah@localhost) by server.sunrise-linux.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3NGTMT12615 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:29:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from miah) To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20020422235308.02a960b0@pop.sfrn.dnai.com>; from andrewr@nam-shub.com on Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:37:15AM -0700 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: 2.11q seems to be the current. But sadly, the HISTORY file is lacking in decent descriptions of changes. eg; * mount: minor fix (Andrey J. Melnikoff) Though, I don't see anything that looks to be a major fix for nfs issues. -miah On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:37:15AM -0700, Andrew Ryan wrote: > I'm using mount 2.11g, as supplied with RH 7.2. Is there a newer mount > program I should be using? Can others duplicate this bug? > > > thanks, > andrew _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs